The contract points are acting up again. I finally got used to the previous gameplay, and after a slight adjustment a while ago, I thought it was a brilliant approach.

Start with around 170 points to qualify for participation, then deduct 1 point every minute for users who meet the criteria to claim.
This method is very good—it doesn't rely on quick reflexes but on actual trading volume as the threshold for claiming.
Essentially, it encourages more trading participation, which is a win-win for both the platform and users.
I time my claims precisely based on my points, lining up to claim.
For users with sufficient trading volume, it provides a certain reward as encouragement—much better than the current lottery system.
Now, the previous functionality has been removed and replaced with a lottery system, which actually discourages users with many contracts from trading more, forcing them and users with less trading volume to compete in the lottery pool for the limited rewards.
For users with fewer points, this may not even be fair.
The best approach should be to retain the original feature that encourages more trading contracts, and add a lottery or a low-threshold claiming mechanism for users with fewer points.
The reward amount should also be slightly lower accordingly, so that the majority with smaller trading volume are taken care of, while still encouraging high-volume traders to trade more.
This is true improvement and progress, rather than constantly changing things to confuse users.
All gameplay should not be KPI-driven; fundamentally, it should be user-oriented—respecting and encouraging users—creating a win-win situation with the platform.
Over-complicating and overhauling the system may ultimately lead to mutual loss and be a step backward.
As a user who has been on GATE for 12 years, I offer this suggestion for decision-makers’ reference.
#合约积分 @Dr. Han@Kevin Lee@Gate Official