Recently, I've been feeling a bit awkward about governance voting, claiming it's community governance, but a bunch of votes are delegated to a few big accounts. Everyone calls for decentralization in daily discussions, but when it comes to clicking "Agree/Disagree," it’s like their brains are also outsourced. I admit myself that sometimes I’m too lazy to research proposals and just want to find a "reliable person" to vote on my behalf, which is convenient but also makes me feel guilty.

What’s more embarrassing is that as soon as the token unlock calendar hits, anxiety and selling pressure start to build up. Repeatedly brought up in the group, but during voting, people pretend it has nothing to do with the price. Honestly, who are governance tokens really governing? Is it the protocol itself or the emotions and chip distribution of large token holders? Anyway, I now prefer to participate less with leverage, focus more on on-chain data and proposal details, and avoid delegation if possible—at least to reduce impulsiveness.