I saw a DAO proposal after 1 a.m., and on the surface it said "optimize incentives."

But only after reading the final attachment did I realize: the default delegation path for voting rights needs to be changed, and the rewards are still tied to "who initiates/who executes."
Basically, it's just giving sugar to a fixed few people, while casually raising the threshold a little, making it easy to overlook if you don't look carefully.
Recently, modularization and the narrative around the DAO layer are hot topics, developers are having a blast over there, while ordinary users are completely confused.
In governance, such things are more easily glossed over with "professional jargon."
Anyway, when I see words like "increase participation" or "higher efficiency," I first open my umbrella:
I look at where the money flows and where the power goes, then decide whether to vote.