Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
#ArthurHayes看好HYPE超越SOL Hyperliquid versus Solana — How exactly is "being better" measured!
Arthur Hayes sets a $150 price target for the token HYPE behind Hyperliquid, believing that before the current cycle ends, HYPE will surpass Solana.
Hyperliquid is a dedicated layer-one blockchain optimized for high-speed derivatives trading; Solana is a general-purpose layer-one blockchain with a large developer community and broad use cases.
In mid-May, Hyperliquid's fully diluted valuation briefly surpassed Solana, but when measured by total value locked (TVL), developer activity, and other metrics, Solana remains far larger than Hyperliquid.
Hyperliquid's support fund collects protocol trading fees to buy back HYPE, creating a self-reinforcing cycle.
In Q1 2026, Hyperliquid's trading volume reached $619 billion, accounting for 34%–44% of the decentralized derivatives market, with total revenue of about $790 million, surpassing Solana's $532 million.
In mid-May, CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange urged U.S. regulators to review Hyperliquid, arguing that its anonymous perpetual futures trading could distort global commodity benchmarks, cause insider trading, and pose sanctions risks.
The CEO of Intercontinental Exchange stated that Hyperliquid is "bigger than Nasdaq."
Hyperliquid is operated by 30 validator nodes, with its code not fully open source, and has previously raised concerns about centralization due to validator node transparency and treasury product review issues.
Future focus should include the structural theme of financial tracks splitting into dedicated systems, and whether Hyperliquid's model can be extended beyond derivatives.
Additionally, attention should be paid to lobbying efforts by CME Group and Intercontinental Exchange, and how Hyperliquid's focused features may influence its development.