

Storm Trade (STORM), positioned as a social-first derivatives trading platform on Telegram operating on the TON blockchain, has been facilitating trading of cryptocurrencies, forex, equities, and commodities since its launch in October 2024. As of February 2026, STORM maintains a market capitalization of approximately $339,063, with a circulating supply of around 46.62 million tokens, and the price stabilizing around $0.007273. This asset, characterized by its deep integration with Telegram's ecosystem, is playing an increasingly notable role in the decentralized derivatives trading sector.
This article will comprehensively analyze STORM's price trends from 2026 to 2031, combining historical patterns, market supply and demand dynamics, ecosystem development, and macroeconomic conditions to provide investors with professional price forecasting and practical investment strategies.
As of February 7th, 2026, STORM is trading at $0.007273, showing a 24-hour price increase of 6.69%. The token's 24-hour trading volume stands at $47,973.59, with a market capitalization of approximately $339,062.95.
The current circulating supply is 46,619,408 STORM tokens, representing 4.66% of the maximum supply of 1 billion tokens. The fully diluted market cap is calculated at $7,273,000. Over different time periods, STORM has shown varied performance: a slight increase of 0.08% in the past hour, a decline of 7.76% over the past week, a decrease of 10.47% over the past month, and a significant decline of 71.57% over the past year.
The token is deployed on the TON blockchain as a Jetton standard token, with the contract address EQBsosmcZrD6FHijA7qWGLw5wo_aH8UN435hi935jJ_STORM. Currently, STORM has approximately 25,906 token holders and is listed on 2 exchanges. The market sentiment index stands at 9, indicating an extreme fear sentiment in the broader market.
The 24-hour price range for STORM has fluctuated between $0.006359 and $0.00727. The token's market dominance is minimal at 0.00028% of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization.
Click to view the current STORM market price

2026-02-06 Fear and Greed Index: 9 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view current Fear & Greed Index
The cryptocurrency market is currently experiencing extreme fear, with the Fear and Greed Index dropping to just 9. This exceptionally low reading signals severe market pessimism and investor anxiety. Such extreme fear conditions typically present contrarian opportunities for long-term investors, as markets often stabilize or recover from these panic lows. However, caution remains warranted as volatility may persist. Traders should monitor key support levels and market fundamentals closely before making investment decisions.

The holding distribution chart reflects the concentration of token holdings across different wallet addresses on the blockchain, serving as a critical indicator of decentralization levels and potential market manipulation risks. For STORM, the current on-chain data reveals a highly concentrated ownership structure that warrants careful examination.
According to the latest holding distribution data, the top address controls approximately 638.34 million STORM tokens, representing 63.83% of the total supply. The second-largest holder possesses 135.88 million tokens (13.58%), while the third ranks at 45.01 million tokens (4.50%). Cumulatively, the top five addresses account for 87.45% of the entire token supply, with only 12.55% distributed among other addresses. This extreme concentration indicates a severely centralized token structure, where a small number of entities wield substantial control over the circulating supply.
Such concentrated holding distribution poses significant implications for market dynamics and price stability. The dominant position of the top holder creates substantial selling pressure risks, as any liquidation activity from this address could trigger dramatic price volatility. Additionally, this concentration level raises concerns regarding potential market manipulation, as major holders possess sufficient leverage to influence price movements through coordinated trading activities. The limited circulation among smaller holders also suggests weak retail participation and reduced organic trading volume, potentially compromising market liquidity and price discovery mechanisms. From a decentralization perspective, this distribution pattern deviates considerably from the ideal of distributed ownership, indicating that STORM's on-chain structure remains vulnerable to centralized control and lacks the robust ecosystem foundation characteristic of mature blockchain projects.
Click to view current STORM Holding Distribution

| Top | Address | Holding Qty | Holding (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UQBDMz...0BasXR | 638338.62K | 63.83% |
| 2 | EQDaC-...VNUdik | 135875.51K | 13.58% |
| 3 | EQByAD...JNJGx6 | 45011.44K | 4.50% |
| 4 | UQC6mq...pvU4NC | 34900.00K | 3.49% |
| 5 | EQA82S...QODs0r | 20553.52K | 2.05% |
| - | Others | 125319.98K | 12.55% |
Mining Grade Collapse: Global silver mining output peaked in 2016 at 900.1 million ounces. Despite silver prices more than doubling over the subsequent nine years, 2025 production stood at approximately 835 million ounces, a 7% decline from peak levels. Mining companies now require processing 1.5 times more ore than a decade ago to extract equivalent silver quantities, significantly amplifying costs, energy consumption, and environmental impact.
Historical Pattern: Following the 2013 silver price crash, many mining companies prioritized extraction from the richest ore deposits to maintain output and profitability. While this stabilized short-term production, it left lower-grade ore underground, which only becomes economically viable when blended with high-grade material.
Current Impact: Silver supply demonstrates extreme insensitivity to price signals. As 70-80% of global silver derives as a byproduct from copper, lead-zinc, and gold mining, silver output depends primarily on these base metals' extraction decisions rather than silver prices themselves. Even if silver reaches $150 per ounce, production increases would remain limited without corresponding rises in copper and zinc prices.
Institutional Holdings: In mid-January, market reports indicated Tesla initiated a one-time purchase of 85 million ounces of physical silver—exceeding COMEX's entire registered inventory. This transaction combined mine contracts, vault purchases, and private deals, bypassing all public exchanges entirely.
Corporate Adoption: Major technology corporations are evaluating direct long-term supply agreements with Latin American silver mining enterprises. In October of the previous year, Samsung C&T secured a $7 million prepayment offtake financing arrangement with Canada's Silver Storm Mining to restart Mexico's La Parrilla silver mine, with underground drilling commencing in mid-January 2026 for potential Q2 2026 production restart. Apple's internal procurement plan reportedly authorized long-term silver supply contracts at psychological price levels up to approximately $573 per ounce under extreme supply disruption scenarios.
National Policy: Market speculation suggests leading electronics and electric vehicle manufacturers, including Apple and Samsung, are assessing opportunities to directly lock in key metal resources through agreements worth hundreds of millions to billions of dollars in coming years, reducing dependence on exchange inventories.
Monetary Policy Impact: As of February 2026, the U.S. Federal Reserve's policy stance toward interest rate adjustments remains a focal point for precious metals markets. Recent inflation data releases have influenced market expectations regarding potential rate cuts, though considerable uncertainty persists regarding the Fed's response to evolving economic dynamics.
Inflation Hedge Characteristics: Silver's performance in inflationary environments has historically demonstrated mixed results. While precious metals typically serve as inflation hedges, silver's dual nature as both an industrial and monetary metal creates complex price dynamics during periods of rising consumer prices.
Geopolitical Factors: Four mutually reinforcing forces drive current silver price revaluation: exchange credit crises, geopolitical supply disruptions, rigid industrial demand lockdown, and supply-side loss of responsiveness to price signals. China's export control measures and central bank de-dollarization purchasing have contributed to structural shifts in global silver flows.
Battery Technology Requirements: Samsung's solid-state battery technology requires silver-carbon composite anode layers, where silver cannot be substituted. Once solid-state batteries enter mass production, Samsung's silver demand will grow exponentially, necessitating secured supply regardless of market price levels.
Photovoltaic Industry Demand: 2025 industrial demand reached 680 million ounces, representing approximately 60% of total demand. Photovoltaic applications accounted for 200-250 million ounces, with this figure unlikely to decline through 2026-2028 as global installation capacity continues expanding.
Ecosystem Applications: Electric vehicle applications consumed 40-60 million ounces, with continued growth anticipated as electrification penetration rates advance. Data centers, 5G infrastructure, and semiconductor manufacturing, while representing smaller individual shares, demonstrate rapid growth trajectories. These applications exhibit economic demand rigidity—they will not disappear due to 50% price increases, as factories, power stations, and reactors cannot operate without silver.
| Year | Predicted High Price | Predicted Average Price | Predicted Low Price | Price Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.009 | 0.00726 | 0.00668 | 0 |
| 2027 | 0.01154 | 0.00813 | 0.00618 | 11 |
| 2028 | 0.01289 | 0.00984 | 0.00836 | 35 |
| 2029 | 0.01534 | 0.01136 | 0.00716 | 56 |
| 2030 | 0.01509 | 0.01335 | 0.01028 | 83 |
| 2031 | 0.01592 | 0.01422 | 0.0081 | 95 |
(1) Long-term Holding Strategy
(2) Active Trading Strategy
(1) Asset Allocation Principles
(2) Risk Hedging Solutions
(3) Secure Storage Solutions
Storm Trade represents an innovative approach to derivatives trading through its Telegram-native platform on TON blockchain, offering exposure to the growing social trading sector. However, the token faces significant headwinds, evidenced by a 71.57% decline over the past year and limited market capitalization of approximately $339,063. The platform's value proposition centers on accessibility and social integration, potentially appealing to users seeking simplified derivatives trading experiences. Short-term risks include continued volatility, limited liquidity across only 2 exchanges, and low circulation ratio that may create supply overhang concerns. The investment carries substantial risk and should only be considered by those with high risk tolerance and understanding of early-stage blockchain projects.
✅ Beginners: Avoid or allocate minimal exposure (under 1% of crypto portfolio). Focus on understanding the platform's mechanics and derivatives trading risks before committing significant capital. Consider starting with small test transactions to evaluate platform usability.
✅ Experienced Investors: Consider speculative position sizing of 2-3% maximum, employing strict stop-loss discipline. Monitor platform growth metrics, trading volume trends, and TON ecosystem developments. Use technical analysis to time entries during consolidation periods.
✅ Institutional Investors: Conduct thorough due diligence on smart contract security, regulatory compliance, and platform economics. Consider strategic allocation only within high-risk venture buckets, with emphasis on ongoing monitoring of user acquisition and platform revenue metrics.
Cryptocurrency investments carry extremely high risks, and this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make prudent decisions based on their own risk tolerance and are advised to consult professional financial advisors. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
STORM is a blockchain-based decentralized project designed to enhance user network activity efficiency and provide financial freedom. It offers innovative digital currency applications for global users seeking financial independence and improved network participation.
STORM reached an all-time high of HK$0.059203 on December 5, 2024, and an all-time low of HK$0.052274 on December 26, 2025. The token has demonstrated moderate volatility within this range throughout its trading history.
STORM's 2024 price prediction reached a maximum of $0.002126. Key factors influencing price include market demand, technology development, trading volume, and overall market sentiment. Predictions are based on technical analysis and market trends.
STORM emphasizes decentralization and privacy protection with higher transaction anonymity. Advantages include stronger anonymity features and community governance. Disadvantages include potential regulatory risks and lower mainstream adoption compared to established tokens.
STORM token investment carries high volatility risk and market uncertainty. Price fluctuations can be dramatic due to market dynamics. Investors should thoroughly understand the asset and only invest capital they can afford to lose. Market conditions are unpredictable.
STORM is listed on multiple major exchanges including Gate.com, MEXC, and BingX, offering solid liquidity. Users can easily buy, sell, and trade STORM tokens on these platforms with good trading volume and market depth.
STORM demonstrates strong technical fundamentals with superior on-chain metrics. Data indicates robust network activity, consistent transaction volume growth, and positive holder sentiment. Technical indicators suggest bullish momentum with key support levels holding firm, signaling potential upside movement in the near term.
STORM project will enhance its distributed computing framework, improve performance and scalability, and launch new APIs and tools to support broader applications and ecosystem growth.











