#数字资产市场动态 New developments in the US Congress's cryptocurrency market legislation. The Senate Banking Committee recently shifted its focus to the housing policy strongly promoted by Trump, resulting in the delay of the crypto market structure bill's review—expected to resume in late February or even March.



However, the Agriculture Committee is proceeding as planned. Their digital asset legislation is still moving forward, with a vote scheduled for January 27. Once approved, this version will need to be merged with the Banking Committee's proposal before being submitted to the full Congress for discussion.

This means the policy framework for the crypto market will have to wait a bit longer. It will be interesting to see what sparks fly when the two committees' versions are combined.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GasBanditvip
· 01-24 22:47
Still waiting, this political game is really intense.

It's either Trump or housing, why does no one take crypto seriously?

The Agriculture Committee is reliable, the real move will be on January 27th, just wait and see how the Banking Committee handles it.

Merging two versions, who knows what kind of tricks they have up their sleeves.

Wait, wait, why are we crypto enthusiasts so passive?

After the merge, there’s a high chance we’ll have to go through more trouble; this cycle will just continue like this.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspectorvip
· 01-24 12:55
Pushed back to March again? The banking committee is really lazy, is housing policy that attractive?

The Agriculture Committee is much more reliable, voting on the 27th, finally someone is getting things done.

What can come out of merging two versions? Hopefully it's not just another compromise.

Let's wait and see. Anyway, we're all used to waiting; policies are always pushed to the next month.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearishvip
· 01-22 02:50
Still procrastinating, huh? This political game is really skillful.

Another rescue by the Agriculture Committee? This combination is a bit desperate.

Will the merger end up being another half-hearted, unfinished project?

Wait a minute, I just want to know who will ultimately compromise.

Can the collision of the two committee versions produce something good?

The bank side is busy with housing policies, and crypto has been pushed into the cold storage again.

The Agriculture Committee is much more reliable; let's wait and see the vote on the 27th.

With this pace, it seems we have to wait until spring for a definitive answer.

The real show begins when the merger version comes out—whose interests will finally be protected?
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 01-22 02:50
Again and again, postponed. This parliament is really leisurely.

---

Agriculture Committee voting on the 27th? Let’s wait and see; the real story is during the merger.

---

As soon as Trump makes a move, everything has to be pushed back a bit.

---

The two committee versions are merging... Tsk, who knows what they’ll end up changing it to.

---

The policy framework is still far off; what can miners do during this period?

---

Late February? I bet they’ll push it back another month.

---

The Banking Committee has moved on to real estate; us crypto folks will just keep waiting.

---

The Agriculture Committee is quite diligent, but I’m worried they’ll end up compromising in the end.

---

The key is the release of the merged version; anything said now is just talking.

---

This speed is truly incredible; policies are never rushed.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHighvip
· 01-22 02:49
Still delaying? Why did the bank committee go into real estate again? I'm really speechless.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 01-22 02:48
so they're pushing crypto back to march but agriculture committee still moving... honestly probably nothing but also lowkey bullish? two different versions merging could either be alpha or complete disaster lmao, just gonna wait and see what happens tbh
Reply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 01-22 02:41
Waiting until March again? This is really frustrating. Why isn't there a confirmed schedule yet?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-22 02:39
Again, another delay? The banking committee really doesn't seem to care at all; housing policies have completely overshadowed crypto...

---

Is it true that the Agriculture Committee will vote on the 27th? Need to keep a close eye; it feels like merging these two versions could be very interesting.

---

Waiting until March? 🙃 Will my position hold until then?

---

The plans of the two committees clash... Basically, it's about who can dominate the narrative at the last moment.

---

Honestly, a delay might actually be a good thing. Having more time to refine details is better than rushing to implement something that could harm users.

---

The Agriculture Committee's perspective is quite fresh; linking crypto with agriculture... It's a bit interesting.

---

Waiting again, the market still has to go through two more months of volatility. So boring.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin