Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#数字资产市场动态 Chairman of the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee, John Bozeman, disclosed on Thursday the committee's version of the cryptocurrency regulation legislation. From the perspective of decentralized finance, there has indeed been some progress, but Bozeman admitted that there are still significant disagreements between the two parties on "core policy positions," and the final implementation will require going through many procedures.
The Democrats' concerns are mainly not about the provisions themselves—sources revealed that they are more politically motivated. They are worried about Trump's and his affiliates' interests in crypto projects, as well as concerns over insufficient consumer protection.
According to Senate rules, such legislation requires bipartisan support to pass, with a threshold of 60 votes. In other words, even if all Republican senators support it, at least 7 Democratic votes are needed. Both the Agriculture Committee and the Banking Committee need to review and vote on it separately, with the Agriculture Committee's review scheduled for next week.
The problem is that the Banking Committee has already hit a snag. A major trading platform previously withdrew its support, causing delays in the review process. There are many points of controversy—tokenized stocks, the division of regulatory authority over DeFi, the boundaries of SEC and CFTC functions, and the incentive design for stablecoins. According to reports, the Banking Committee may postpone crypto legislation for a few weeks and instead focus on addressing housing affordability issues.
It feels like just acting, with no real progress.
The Democrats are really just making excuses, consumer protection? Who would believe that?
The 60-vote threshold... we'll be waiting forever.
The exchange withdrawing support is like shooting oneself in the foot, hilarious.
Tokenized stocks, DeFi ownership, stablecoins... why does everything have to be a fight?
The Banking Committee turned around to focus on housing issues; it seems that crypto is just a hot potato.
When it comes to political efficiency in the US, it's truly remarkable.
This wave of Democratic voices is nothing but political maneuvering; the crypto business on Trump's side is already sensitive.
The Banking Committee really dropped the ball. A single exchange changing its stance can delay things, showing there's no real consensus.
Still have to wait a few weeks? The market can't wait, my friend.
Regulation has never been about helping retail investors; whether this bill passes or not, it's big institutions harvesting profits.
Why is the Democratic Party still debating Trump's issues? Can't they focus on consumer protection first?
The Banking Committee keeps delaying, it seems exchanges are also starting to pass the buck.
The crypto bill is cooling off; 60 votes are too hard to get.
The division of regulatory authority over DeFi has always been chaotic, and the SEC and CFTC have never clarified it.
Stablecoins are like hot potatoes; no one wants to be the first to move.
So we still have to wait a few more months, right? American efficiency is truly unmatched.
Wait, the exchange is withdrawing support? How scared are they?
Starting from 60 votes, the Democrats are still bickering; this bill probably won't pass this year.
Lack of consumer protection? Definitely needs regulation; it was too chaotic before.
I just want to know when I can safely develop blockchain games; right now, it's all just regulatory rumors.
Exchanges keep jumping back and forth; this move is quite damaging.
Damn, I have to wait a few weeks again; this speed is slower than a snail.
By the way, does no one investigate Trump's conflict of interest?
DeFi isn't even fully understood yet, and now they're tokenizing stocks; regulation is becoming more and more complex.
The 60-vote threshold is really a bottleneck; it's just a matter of 7 votes.
What is the Banking Committee doing? Are they busy with real estate? Crypto really can't get any respect.