Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#Strategy加仓比特币 MicroStrategy makes another round of aggressive buying, this time directly acquiring 22,305 Bitcoins, bringing the total holdings to 709,700 Bitcoins, accounting for over 3.3% of the circulating supply on the entire network—this scale is already a significant institutional-level signal.
The data is eye-catching: the average cost of this new batch is around $95,284, while the overall holding cost is only $75,979, with unrealized gains surpassing $1 billion. This cost advantage itself demonstrates how stable their strategy is—using stock financing to cycle and buy coins, continuously increasing positions as long as the stock valuation has a premium, effectively freezing a large amount of circulating chips in the market.
From a market perspective, U.S. stocks are quite volatile at the moment, yet leading institutions are increasing their positions against the trend, injecting confidence into the entire ecosystem. Historically, once such major players establish their actions, subsequent institutional follow-up usually isn't far behind, and sentiment and buying pressure tend to resonate.
But don’t ignore the risks: MicroStrategy’s stock price and Bitcoin’s price are deeply linked. If Bitcoin experiences a significant correction, a synchronized decline in stock price is inevitable. Additionally, keep a close eye on MNAV (Net Asset Value); if it falls below 1, the logic framework for increasing holdings collapses.
From a trading perspective: if Bitcoin drops back to the $92,000–$93,000 range, consider entering in batches, with a stop-loss set at $88,000, and an upward target aiming for the $100,000 mark. The pace of institutional accumulation often provides retail investors a good opportunity for low-cost entry—key is to follow up on the right side, rather than fighting on the left side.
---
MNAV falling below 1 means disaster, basically betting on Bitcoin to rise
---
Following this set on the right side sounds easy, but in actual operation, 99% of people are on the left side with heavy losses
---
72 million Bitcoins are locked in MicroStrategy's hands, with such liquidity, the market spread might get even larger
---
Seeing a paper unrealized profit of $1 billion is satisfying, but they are also bearing the greatest correction risk, definitely not as conflicted as us
---
Can we really wait for the 92,000-93,000 buy-in point? Feels like this wave is heading straight for 100,000
Stop, a 1 billion floating profit sounds great but when the crash really happens, the stock price will also be sacrificed, no one mentions this risk
Following up on the right side sounds easy, I just want to know if a few retail investors can really hold onto 92k to 100k
I understand the logic of financing cycle coin purchases, but isn't this just betting on stock valuation premiums? What if the premium disappears?
I'm optimistic about this pace, but the problem is you need to have the patience to wait for MNAV not to break 1
---
1 billion floating profit? This is the game of the wealthy; we can only follow along and share some soup.
---
What are you afraid of? As long as it doesn't fall below 88, it's a blood profit. History has proven that following institutions is never wrong.
---
The stock price and the coin price are tied together... this risk point definitely needs to be cautious; if MNAV crashes, it's all over.
---
Following on the right side, there's nothing wrong with that statement; those who aggressively fought on the left side have all been cut as chives.