March 2026 Summary: Overall profit, but wear and drawdown control are not good enough

During this period, I received positive feedback from these trades:
1. Ethereum group trade from 19XX to over 2100, going long, with a relatively large position and significant profit;
2. Bitcoin peaked at 76,000 and confirmed short at 74, holding until 685, with a large position and substantial profit;
3. Gold bottomed at 42XX-4550, catching a rapid rebound, with an average position, earning a few thousand USD, and fortunately, the speed was fast enough, providing a good holding experience;
4. CRCL started going long from 100, T'd a wave, then fully took profit at 124, always positive feedback.
The earliest Ethereum long was in early March, I remember March 4th.
So, after a month of trading, the only truly profitable and relatively successful trades are these four.
The rest either yielded small profits, had poor holding experience (like the silver and gold short from 525 to 5000 in a smooth trending market, then got shaken out during the volatility), or were just wear and tear.
Some reflections worth considering:
1. Can there be no wear and tear? I think it's very difficult, especially in range-bound volatile markets, where continuous position testing is necessary, and wear is inevitable;
2. But upon closer inspection, there are actually too many ineffective operations, such as opening test orders at non-critical points, which is very unnecessary. If I control and reduce more than half of these ineffective actions, profits could at least increase significantly (reducing wear and drawdown).