Deflation Comparison: Who is More Powerful, JST or UNI? Image Breakdown

Recently, both JST and UNI have initiated token buyback and burn mechanisms, each constructing a closed loop for token value capture. In terms of execution intensity and short-term market performance, JST's actions are particularly prominent.

1. Buyback and Burn Mechanism

JST (JustLend DAO)
1 / Use protocol net income + USDD multi-chain ecosystem profit for buyback and destruction
2 / Expected to destroy approximately 60 million USD, about 20% of the supply
3 / The remaining portion will continue to be burned over the next four quarters and will be included in the new net income.
4 / Fully comply with DAO governance processes, on-chain verifiable hashes, high transparency.

UNI (Uniswap)
1 / After the proposal is passed, the revenue from protocol fees, L2 Sequencer charges, PFDA, aggregator Hooks, etc. will be used for burning.
2 / A one-time retroactive destruction of 100 million UNI, accounting for approximately 16% of the circulating supply.
3 / Directly reduce LP earnings, which may affect liquidity
4 / Historically, attempts to switch rates have been unsuccessful multiple times, with great difficulty in advancement, and there may be legal risks related to securities/taxes.

The destruction path of JST is more direct and has been implemented, while the mechanism of UNI covers multiple sources of income, has great potential, but still requires governance and market validation for short-term implementation.

2. Market Performance
•JST has increased by 16.74% over the past year.
•UNI decreased by 5.71% over the year

In the short term, the repurchase and destruction of JST provides clear support for market scarcity, while establishing a positive closed loop.

Three, Ecological Foundation and Sustainability

JST / JustLend DAO, five years with zero safety incidents, the protocol is secure and reliable, high yield support (USDD deposits can reach 6%-12% APY), TRON energy rental income is stable, providing a sustainable funding source for buyback and burn.

UNI / Uniswap, a mainstream DEX on Ethereum, with high trading volume, a broad user base, significant ecological revenue potential, and a multi-dimensional design for long-term value capture.

Four, finally say a few words.
1 / JST: High burn intensity, transparent path, clear short-term market signals, solid ecological foundation.
2 / UNI: The potential for the burn mechanism is great, but its implementation requires governance and regulatory validation.

In comparison, JST stands out in terms of execution strength and market visibility, while both enhance token value through a deflationary mechanism.

The epic buyback and burn of JST shows that deflation not only enhances the scarcity of the token but also boosts community confidence, laying the foundation for long-term value in the future.

@justinsuntron @DeFi_JUST #TRONEcoStar