Cryptocurrency buyback activity reached $880 million throughout 2025, with Hyperliquid commanding the lion's share at $644.6 million, followed by another major player at $138.2 million. Despite this aggressive capital deployment, token prices have remained largely stagnant—a puzzling disconnect between bullish fiscal action and market performance.
Optimism is taking a more measured approach, committing to $9.1 million in annual OP token purchases funded by Superchain revenue. This methodical strategy highlights a critical metric in the buyback playbook: the coverage ratio must exceed 1 for genuine supply contraction to occur. Without this threshold, buybacks become mere accounting exercises rather than effective deflationary mechanisms.
The question hanging over the market: why hasn't increased capital reallocation translated into price appreciation? Token scarcity alone doesn't guarantee demand.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
wrekt_but_learning
· 01-09 20:12
8.8 billion burned in and the price still remains unmoved, this is outrageous... Can buying it back push the price up? Wake up, buddy.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 01-09 20:09
Burning money to buy back 800 million but not boosting the market, isn't that just left hand giving to the right hand? I really can't hold it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-09 20:00
Repurchased 8.8 billion but no one bought in, this is the irony of Web3... Money was poured in, but the price remains dead and dull.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 01-09 19:58
Spent 8.8 billion dollars and still didn't go up, this is outrageous... Looks like burning money can't save the crypto market either.
Cryptocurrency buyback activity reached $880 million throughout 2025, with Hyperliquid commanding the lion's share at $644.6 million, followed by another major player at $138.2 million. Despite this aggressive capital deployment, token prices have remained largely stagnant—a puzzling disconnect between bullish fiscal action and market performance.
Optimism is taking a more measured approach, committing to $9.1 million in annual OP token purchases funded by Superchain revenue. This methodical strategy highlights a critical metric in the buyback playbook: the coverage ratio must exceed 1 for genuine supply contraction to occur. Without this threshold, buybacks become mere accounting exercises rather than effective deflationary mechanisms.
The question hanging over the market: why hasn't increased capital reallocation translated into price appreciation? Token scarcity alone doesn't guarantee demand.