2026-01-09 23:24:19

A major news has recently exploded in the crypto circle— the core development team supporting leading privacy projects like ZEC, DASH, and others has collectively resigned due to internal governance disagreements. This is not just a common personnel change but a loud alarm bell for the entire privacy coin sector.

The root cause of the issue lies in deep disagreements within the team regarding the project's direction. The official statement cites "governance disagreements," but in reality, it reflects fundamental conflicts between upper management and the technical team over the development roadmap. The technical leaders ultimately chose to resign and start anew rather than continue to compromise within the existing framework.

Why is this event worth vigilance? The key lies in the technical particularity of privacy coin projects. The core competitiveness of projects like ZEC relies entirely on advanced cryptography implementations and privacy protocol optimizations, which require specialized technical teams for maintenance and iteration. If this team departs, subsequent technical maintenance and innovation face the risk of disruption. New developers may either be unable to quickly grasp the complex technical architecture or may overturn the original technical solutions, both of which could cause substantial impacts on the project ecosystem.

A deeper issue is that the privacy coin sector itself has inherent tension between the ideal of decentralization and the reality of governance efficiency. In theory, privacy coins should be highly decentralized, but in practice, most projects still rely on core development teams to drive technological progress. This contradiction becomes especially prone to crises when the project is less mature and community consensus is not yet solidified.

Market reactions to this event have been straightforward—ZEC dropped by 7% within 24 hours of the announcement, with the price falling back to $461. This decline reflects investors' concerns about the project's stability and ongoing technical sustainability.

For ordinary participants, this case illustrates one point: when evaluating privacy coins or any project that heavily depends on a core team, it is crucial to focus on the team's stability, the reasonableness of governance mechanisms, and the sufficiency of backup plans. Merely focusing on technological innovation is not enough; personnel and institutional issues are often the key factors determining the project's long-term prospects.

ZEC-11,08%

DASH-1,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasWaster

· 1h ago

Once the core team runs, is ZEC about to be finished? --- Basically, it's just that people's trust has dispersed, and the team can't be led. --- The ideal of decentralization is very appealing, but in reality, it's all supported by a few big shots... hilarious. --- A 7% decline is actually quite restrained; I thought it would be cut in half. --- Another story of "trusting technology" being slapped in the face by reality. --- The privacy coin track is already highly competitive, and now even insiders are fighting each other. --- Investing in projects that rely on people is really a gamble of character; it's ridiculous. --- Governance disagreements sound very official, but in reality, it's probably a power struggle. --- If ZEC can't find a new technical lead, it's really game over. --- So I still only buy BTC; there are too many stories with these small coins.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 9h ago

Once the core team disperses, privacy coins are doomed. To put it plainly, that's what it's all about. Governance disagreements? That's a joke. It's all about money and power. A 7% drop in ZEC is just a joke. I think it will continue to decline.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 20h ago

Once the core team runs, privacy coins are finished --- That's why I never go all-in on a project... When people's hearts are scattered, the team falls apart --- ZEC drops 7%? I bet five bucks it will keep breaking --- To put it simply, privacy coins are a false proposition; no matter how advanced the technology is, it can't withstand human issues --- Governance disagreements? Wake up, it's just a power struggle --- The wave of resignations is coming; who dares to touch privacy coins --- So decentralization is basically a scam... In the end, it all depends on what the big players think --- The technological gap is more frightening than the price drop --- This wave of ZEC is a bit risky; can the new team handle it

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 20h ago

Once the core team runs, privacy coins are finished People leave, the tea cools, technology is left unfinished, ZEC is indeed in a precarious position Honestly, it's still a problem of centralization; decentralization is always just a slogan Governance disagreements are just conflicts of interest, stop pretending A 7% drop isn't really a big deal; what I'm really worried about is no one maintaining it afterward Privacy coins rely on genius developers to survive, and now the geniuses have left Investing in these kinds of projects really depends on the team’s stability; betting on team stability is really tough It seems like every major project ultimately falls apart due to internal conflicts Resignation waves are the most common thing in the crypto circle, and ZEC has indeed had a rough time this time

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 20h ago

The core team running away, this is really outrageous. ZEC, this time we need to reflect on how difficult decentralization really is.

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Vaccinated

· 20h ago

Another team exit scam, privacy coins are really risky in this track Core developers have dispersed, who will fill the technical gap? This wave of ZEC probably will cool off for a while Honestly, it's still a centralized scam; decentralization is just a slogan In my opinion, team issues are more deadly than technical problems That's why I sold all my privacy coins early on, they're too unreliable Governance disagreements? Translation: management and technical teams are at odds A 7% drop is just the beginning, it feels like it will continue to break new lows Enjoying the show, waiting for the next project to have issues

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 20h ago

Once the core team runs, privacy coins are finished The wave of resignations is indeed terrifying, but can ZEC still hold up? A project relying on a single team to support it will eventually fail Governance disagreements? Basically internal conflicts, investors should run Now I understand, decentralization is all a lie Technical gaps are more frightening than anything else, run everyone ZEC is doomed to fall in this wave Personnel fluctuations = death knell, no doubt The team’s faith has collapsed, technical innovation is pointless This is the fate of privacy coins, they are too fragile

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 20h ago

Another cyclical disillusionment. The core team leaving, to put it plainly, shows that beneath decentralization, it still relies on people. Once the trust disperses, the so-called technological advantage becomes just quicksand. This is the real dilemma of privacy coins, not a cryptography issue. A 7% drop? That's too gentle; the market hasn't even reacted yet. History loves to repeat itself this way, always claiming that this time is different.

View OriginalReply0