2026-01-10 01:26:52

Rather than chasing after MEME coins that follow the trend, it's better to look at where the truly transformative technology for the industry is. Recently, I came across an interesting direction—decentralized data storage, specifically a brand-new storage architecture solution.

Let me ask you a question: how much data does it take to train GPT-5? The answer is at least 100PB. Where do all these massive amounts of data go, and who manages them? This is a trillion-dollar-level challenge.

Currently, the situation is that centralized cloud services are too costly, too slow, and pose security risks. Traditional decentralized storage solutions are not stable enough, and this contradiction has persisted for many years. Until recently, a technological approach emerged that completely changed the game rules.

Here are some key breakthroughs:

**The first is cost advantage.** Several AI startups I know are spending millions of dollars monthly just on storage. Now, by switching to this new solution in bulk, they can cut costs by over 60%. This is not a gimmick; it’s real savings on the ledger.

**The second is security mechanism.** It uses erasure coding technology—simply put, splitting one piece of data into 1000 parts and dispersing them globally. Even if 900 parts are lost, the original data can still be fully reconstructed. This level of security is used even in banking-grade applications.

**The third is unlimited scalability.** Traditional blockchain storage has a ceiling, but this solution can seamlessly connect to any storage device—large data centers or personal hard drives. The growth limit is almost nonexistent.

Looking ahead, three obvious explosive points are brewing: by the end of the year, the first batch of large AI companies will complete migration, causing storage demand to soar exponentially; mid-next year, traditional cloud service providers will start to follow suit; and subsequently, the entire industry will scale up applications. This is not about hype for new tokens, but the deployment phase of new infrastructure.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayerZeroEnjoyer

· 8h ago

Erasure coding is indeed powerful, but which specific scheme is it? I don't want to get chopped up like a leek.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 18h ago

Hey, wait a minute, can this technical route really be implemented? Or is it just another hype concept? --- Cut 60% of costs... that number is pretty impressive. We need to see the actual project in action before believing it. --- I've heard of the erase coding method. Bank-level security sounds good, but the ecosystem is still a problem. --- Personal hard drives can also be connected? Then how about privacy and regulation? Just thinking about it is complicated. --- Industry infrastructure is easy to talk about but hard to truly popularize. --- The key is, who is pushing this behind the scenes? You need to look at the team and funding sources to judge if it's reliable. --- I agree that it's more reliable than MEME coins, but if you really want to invest, wait until you see actual user data. --- The trillion-dollar market cake is attractive, but the real question is how much of it can we actually get.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 18h ago

Wait, what exactly is this technical route project? Just talking about cutting costs by 60% sounds a bit vague.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 18h ago

Wait, the plan to split the erasure code into 1000 parts... Are banks all using it? I haven't heard of it before. Which company specifically developed it?

View OriginalReply0

Degentleman

· 18h ago

Cutting costs by 60%... Is that true? Are there any real cases to show?

View OriginalReply0

ForkItAll

· 18h ago

Uh, wait a minute, this data is distributed across 1,000 locations worldwide. What if a major node's operator runs away...

View OriginalReply0

rugged_again

· 18h ago

Bro, is this plan really legit or just another scheme to cut the leeks... --- Wait, erasing 900 copies of lost code and still restoring it? Is this technology really that awesome? --- Cut costs by 60%, but I feel like these numbers are a bit suspicious... --- Talking so much, might as well just say which project it is, so I can do some research. --- Another trillion-level challenge and a game-changer—I've heard these words several times last year. --- If this thing really takes off, big capital would have already come in, right? Why haven't I heard about it? --- No hype, no blackening. From a technical perspective, this idea is indeed interesting, but implementation still depends on the ecosystem. --- GPT-5's storage problem definitely exists, but can your plan solve the commercialization issue? --- Personal hard drives participating in storage? Can security really be guaranteed? Feels like there are vulnerabilities. --- Let's see if AI giants really migrate over by the end of the year; then we'll know what's real and what's fake.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 18h ago

100PB of data is indeed massive, but to be honest, can this solution really beat AWS? It all depends on how it is implemented. Erase coding sounds good, but how do you ensure consistency in distributed storage? That's the key. Cutting costs by 60% sounds great, but what about maturity? Is it too early to jump in and risk becoming a bag holder... Can personal hard drives also be integrated? Wouldn't that pose even greater security risks? I find it hard to understand. It looks promising, but when can this really become widespread? Or is it just another PPT project?

View OriginalReply0