There is an organization in the Netherlands called Dusk Foundation, established in 2018, bringing together cryptographers, financial practitioners, and blockchain developers. What are they doing? They aim to build a financial infrastructure that protects privacy, meets regulatory requirements, and remains decentralized, enabling true integration of traditional finance and DeFi.



In January last year, their led Dusk Network officially launched its mainnet. This Layer 1 blockchain is quite interesting—a privacy chain specifically designed for regulated financial markets, a pioneering concept worldwide. It uses PlonK zero-knowledge proof technology, with the core idea that transaction details are completely hidden externally, but regulatory agencies can verify compliance requirements like KYC/AML through encrypted proofs. It sounds contradictory, but this is their unique design approach.

This "privacy equals compliance" solution allows institutions to do what? Directly issue, trade, and settle real-world assets—such as bonds, stocks, and securities—on the chain. The benefits are obvious: first, no need to expose sensitive information; second, significantly reduced intermediary costs; third, settlement speed is ridiculously fast—moving from traditional T+2 to instant settlement.

Regarding technical architecture, they adopt a modular design: DuskDS handles efficient PoS consensus, Rusk VM supports privacy smart contract execution, and DuskEVM (scheduled to go live in Q4 2025) will add EVM compatibility, attracting more developers to participate in the ecosystem.
DUSK4,01%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningSentryvip
· 01-10 17:32
This is the true future financial infrastructure. Achieving both privacy and compliance is not a dream. ngl Dusk's approach is indeed excellent, pushing zero-knowledge proofs to new heights. Why isn't anyone hyping this up? Projects that quietly do practical work are actually less popular. Wait, will the ecosystem thrive after DuskEVM goes live? Will developers buy into it? It sounds like just a pie in the sky; can it really be implemented? Does the regulatory side truly approve? However, real-time settlement is indeed impressive, faster than traditional T+2 by a lot. This track seems to have a lot of potential; the integration of compliance and privacy might be the future trend.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 01-10 14:57
Can privacy + compliance really be achieved simultaneously? The PlonK approach has some real potential, but when it comes to RWA on the blockchain, it still depends on actual adoption...
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalistvip
· 01-10 14:56
Privacy + Compliance? It sounds like you can have both, but Dusk's approach with zero-knowledge proofs is quite clever. Regulatory authorities are satisfied, and transactions are tightly hidden. PlonK is indeed powerful, but for real-world assets to be on-chain, we still need a mature ecosystem. No matter how aggressive the hype, practical application is more convincing. Wait, DuskEVM is only launching at the end of the year. With no EVM compatibility yet, how good can the liquidity be? The developer ecosystem is still a bit thin. If this architecture can truly be implemented, the RWA track will need to be reordered... But honestly, if CeFi really moves RWA on-chain, it still depends on whether this chain can withstand the test of institutional-level traffic.
View OriginalReply0
TheShibaWhisperervip
· 01-10 14:53
The privacy compliance package sounds good, but will there still be pitfalls when it comes to actual implementation? Can regulators really accept it?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fcvip
· 01-10 14:48
Privacy + Compliance? This idea is indeed fresh, but whether it can be implemented effectively depends on subsequent performance.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 01-10 14:47
honestly the plonk zk-proof angle is solid but... can we talk about the actual tps numbers? because "instant settlement" sounds great until you hit real throughput constraints. showing the math or it's just marketing speak tbh
Reply0
FlatTaxvip
· 01-10 14:35
Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? I need to ponder this logic... However, Dusk's approach to zero-knowledge proofs is indeed interesting.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)