2026-01-10 16:23:27

Industry insiders recently shared an interesting viewpoint on social media: the super cycle of the cryptocurrency market is about to begin. However, they also admitted that this judgment could be wrong.

There is substantial support behind this bullish sentiment. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced it would remove cryptocurrencies from the priority risk list in 2026 — this is definitely a positive signal for the entire industry. A shift in regulatory attitude often brings a noticeable boost to market sentiment.

From the perspective of market cycles, a friendly policy environment is indeed a catalyst. But as the industry insider mentioned, no one can predict the market direction with 100% certainty. The super cycle could be just around the corner, or it might still require more time to develop. The key is how exchanges, project teams, and market participants seize this wave of policy dividends.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoResearcher

· 01-10 16:53

According to the data from the white paper, the signal strength of the SEC's recent actions is indeed worth paying attention to, but we still need to look at the actual voting turnout of governance proposals to assess the true market consensus... Honestly, judgments like "the super cycle is coming" are essentially unverified assumptions, and I haven't seen sufficient on-chain evidence to support the premise that these assumptions are valid. No one can predict 100%? That's exactly what I want to criticize—the incentive incompatibility problem in Token economics is once again exposed here. Short-term sentiment and long-term fundamentals do have a noticeable divergence, and I need to review the exchange data further before making any conclusions. Why does it feel like we're back to the binary view of "policy friendliness = inevitable bull market"? This kind of logical flaw is full of holes. The key still depends on whether DAO governance efficiency can truly optimize resource allocation, rather than just gambling on policy dividends.

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 01-10 16:53

Regulatory friendliness ≠ reaching the moon, but it definitely changes the game rules. It depends on who can buy the dip.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 01-10 16:53

Relaxation of regulations is indeed a signal, but a super cycle? Uh... I've heard that too many times before. Another "this time really is different" story, let's see next year.

View OriginalReply0

TerraNeverForget

· 01-10 16:47

That move by the SEC is indeed something, but super cycle? Uh... I feel like that term has been overused too many times.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecovery

· 01-10 16:35

ngl the "super cycle" pitch is exactly what i flagged three cycles ago... regulatory theater always precedes the rug pull, watch the exploitation patterns unfold 🔍

Reply0