Market trends are warming up, but industry insiders are starting to become cautious. Recently, there have been voices suggesting that a super cycle might indeed be on the horizon, but only if we don't fall for "cognitive biases." This kind of rational perspective is especially valuable in an environment full of FOMO.
Let's first look at some macro signals:
**Policy Changes** Regulatory authorities are intentionally working to remove certain crypto assets from the "high risk" list, which is significant for the compliance process. In other words, barriers for large capital inflows are gradually being cleared.
**How Capital Flows** When macro pressures ease, where does the money go? Historical experience tells us it will prioritize assets with strong community support and new narrative concepts. Coins like ETH, ZEC, and POL happen to have these characteristics.
**Lessons from Cycles** Those who truly make money are often not the most devout believers, but the most rational players. Maintaining a cool head is more effective than blindly going all-in to navigate bull and bear markets.
So the question is—under the dual influence of policy and sentiment, is this really the start of a super cycle, or is Wall Street setting another trap? The answer might be more important than the price movements themselves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 13h ago
It's the truth, most people are blinded by FOMO
Exactly, rational people have already been quietly making moves
Wall Street's tricks are getting old, and this time they want to collect an IQ tax again
Policy easing ≠ direct takeoff, don't be fooled
ETH and POL do have stories to tell, but the risks are not small
Cold thinking is really difficult, few can hold on while watching others make money
If this super cycle really arrives, those who are most anxious now will be the last to get on board
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 14h ago
It's the same old story. When the big players start to get cautious, does that mean it's coming? I think it's all just an excuse to harvest the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 14h ago
Caution from the big players is a signal, indicating everyone is waiting for the wind to come.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBro
· 14h ago
Here we go again? Regulatory positive news + community narrative. I've seen this combo too many times, and in the end, it's still the retail investors getting stuck with the losses.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 14h ago
Once again, it's the same set of "rational player" arguments—sounds good, but can you really buy the dip?
Market trends are warming up, but industry insiders are starting to become cautious. Recently, there have been voices suggesting that a super cycle might indeed be on the horizon, but only if we don't fall for "cognitive biases." This kind of rational perspective is especially valuable in an environment full of FOMO.
Let's first look at some macro signals:
**Policy Changes**
Regulatory authorities are intentionally working to remove certain crypto assets from the "high risk" list, which is significant for the compliance process. In other words, barriers for large capital inflows are gradually being cleared.
**How Capital Flows**
When macro pressures ease, where does the money go? Historical experience tells us it will prioritize assets with strong community support and new narrative concepts. Coins like ETH, ZEC, and POL happen to have these characteristics.
**Lessons from Cycles**
Those who truly make money are often not the most devout believers, but the most rational players. Maintaining a cool head is more effective than blindly going all-in to navigate bull and bear markets.
So the question is—under the dual influence of policy and sentiment, is this really the start of a super cycle, or is Wall Street setting another trap? The answer might be more important than the price movements themselves.