2026-01-10 18:22:05

Speaking of the development dilemma in crypto finance, an eternal contradiction always looms: privacy and compliance, can they really only be a choice between the two?

Traditional financial institutions protect data privacy through centralized systems, but the cost is sacrificing transparency and operational efficiency. Conversely, many public blockchains tout decentralization and transparency, yet due to a lack of privacy protection and compliance tools, institutional investors have kept their distance. This situation has persisted for several years.

Since its founding in 2018, Dusk Network has been pondering this issue. It’s not simply patching the existing framework but redesigning a Layer 1 blockchain from the ground up. Rather than just a technical breakthrough, it’s an innovative approach—Dusk integrates seemingly conflicting requirements like privacy, compliance, and scalability into a modular architecture.

The core logic is actually straightforward: each functional module (consensus, privacy, smart contracts) can be independently optimized, enabling it to meet the demands of various complex financial scenarios. For example, Dusk natively integrates privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs to ensure that transaction and contract logic are not leaked. At the same time, it has designed an "auditability" mechanism, allowing authorized parties to verify transaction compliance when needed. In other words, privacy and compliance are no longer a trade-off but can coexist.

This design framework immediately broadens Dusk’s application scenarios. Besides supporting conventional decentralized financial innovations, it can also provide truly secure, compliant, and efficient solutions for bringing traditional assets onto the blockchain—tokenization of securities, bonds, real estate, and other tangible assets can all be conducted on this platform.

Particularly noteworthy is that as the RWA (Real-World Assets) track heats up, these privacy protection and compliance features will become Dusk’s greatest competitive advantages. As more traditional assets enter the blockchain world, infrastructure that is both regulator-friendly and privacy-preserving will be truly scarce. Dusk’s approach may be opening another door to financial democratization.

DUSK13,6%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SilentObserver

· 12h ago

Privacy and compliance coexist? Sounds good, but has it really been implemented? Wait, zero-knowledge proofs plus auditability, how is that not contradictory? If Dusk's system really works, institutions should have flocked in long ago, right? The RWA trend is indeed hot, but who can guarantee that this infrastructure is truly scarce? Modular architecture sounds like a master key, but it’s also the most prone to failure. A seesaw relationship? It seems like some trade-offs are necessary. These types of projects claim every year to solve privacy issues, but what’s the result?

View OriginalReply0

HorizonHunter

· 12h ago

Can privacy and compliance coexist? This idea is indeed refreshing, but the key still depends on the implementation results. There are too many projects that talk the talk but don't walk the walk. After RWA became popular, everyone claims to be compliant and friendly. It's hard to say why Dusk stands out. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and auditability sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another over-promising solution. Do institutional investors really care about privacy? I think they care more about stability and risk control. Dusk's ability to handle these is the real key. The privacy seesaw problem should have been solved long ago. Now that it's being discussed, it feels a bit late.

View OriginalReply0

ForkPrince

· 13h ago

Privacy and compliance can coexist, and this idea is indeed refreshing... but can Dusk really be implemented as such, or is it just a promise on paper? --- RWA is coming, and having this kind of infrastructure is definitely necessary, otherwise it's just a castle in the air... I'm a bit looking forward to this direction. --- A seesaw turning into a balance scale sounds good, but the key still depends on how it works in practice. --- To be honest, this combination of zero-knowledge proofs + auditability is indeed a new approach. I have to admit, the idea still has some substance. --- I've been pondering since 2018, and at least I've calmed down now. It's more reliable than those projects that are eager for quick gains. --- Regulatory-friendly + privacy-preserving... Just listen to it. How many can truly achieve it?

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 13h ago

Can privacy and compliance coexist? It sounds ideal, but can it really be achieved? It still depends on actual implementation. If the current RWA hype can incorporate privacy mechanisms, that would be really appealing. Traditional finance doesn't care how advanced your technology is. Dusk has a good approach, but with so many competitors, it might take a long time to see clear results. The zero-knowledge proof set has been around for a while; the core issue is whether the ecosystem can take off. If this set of technologies can truly attract institutional players, then it would really break the deadlock. But it's still too early to tell. Privacy protection is possible, but the auditing mechanisms must be genuinely transparent. Don’t turn it into just a superficial effort. Remember those projects claiming to be "secure and decentralized"? None of them really survived in the end. With RWA being so hot, I wonder how big the bubble really is... "Compliance-friendly" sounds like pandering to regulators. But isn't decentralization the original intent? If it were truly possible to satisfy both privacy and compliance at the same time, why haven't many old projects done this? There must be some trade-offs involved.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandSister

· 13h ago

Honestly, someone should have done this a long time ago—privacy and compliance can coexist... But Dusk's approach definitely has some substance; combining zero-knowledge proofs with auditability is a pretty good combo. If RWA really takes off, such infrastructure is indeed necessary. Otherwise, traditional financial giants would see the mess of privacy and compliance and just turn around and leave.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 13h ago

Can privacy and compliance coexist? It sounds great, but can Dusk really handle this... --- Zero-knowledge proofs + auditability, this combo is indeed interesting, but we'll see when RWA actually comes into play. --- After all this time, someone finally understands it thoroughly—not all chains are called "Layer 1." --- The piece of the institutional investor pie is indeed large. Whoever grabs it first wins. Dusk has a good idea, but it still depends on implementation. --- Wait, modular architecture sounds easy, but if you really need to independently tune each module... isn't the code complexity off the charts? --- When RWA takes off, Dusk suddenly becomes valuable—that logic I believe. --- Another solution to the "impossible triangle." I'll just see who can really pull it off. --- Compliance is usually a lot of talk. How reliable is Dusk's "auditability" mechanism?

View OriginalReply0