You might think that all DEXs follow the same path. But ACX breaks this expectation — it chooses the Order Book model instead of the traditional AMM. This choice is actually very wise because trading real-world assets requires market-level precision and liquidity depth, rather than slippage pricing based on pool liquidity. In other words: RWA markets need a true trading marketplace, not just a simple liquidity pool. In today's increasingly complex on-chain finance, this design approach is worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWhisperer
· 6h ago
order book on-chain actually makes sense... been watching mempool patterns and the slippage waste on amm pools during rwa trades is genuinely insane. acx might've finally cracked the timing problem
Reply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 01-10 23:40
Order book, finally someone remembers it. It should have been done this way a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 01-10 23:35
Order book this move is indeed clever, RWA can't rely solely on AMM to mess around
---
I like this idea of ACX, finally someone is making DEX look like a real market
---
Wait, can the order book really solve the liquidity problem of RWA... I'm a bit worried about the initial cold start
---
No more pretending, the AMM approach is garbage for RWA, ACX's move is waking up the dreaming DEXs
---
Honestly, the order book model should have been tried long ago, RWA needs precise pricing, not slippage gambling
---
So is ACX doing real on-chain finance? Not those liquidity mining tricks
---
This idea is solid, but the question is who will be the market maker... is the depth enough
---
Finally seeing a DEX take RWA seriously, others really should reflect
---
Order book vs AMM, this time ACX bet on the right direction
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 01-10 23:25
Finally, someone dares to say that AMM is not the way; order book is the right path.
---
RWA trading must use order book; the slippage approach really can't handle it.
---
Wait, is ACX really smart or just hype?
---
Pool mode is indeed outdated, especially during large RWA transactions.
---
Order book > AMM, I agree with this argument, but can the ecosystem keep up?
---
It seems everyone should see how ACX is doing it; on-chain finance should follow this approach.
---
Only now are they adopting order book, ten years behind CeFx.
You might think that all DEXs follow the same path. But ACX breaks this expectation — it chooses the Order Book model instead of the traditional AMM. This choice is actually very wise because trading real-world assets requires market-level precision and liquidity depth, rather than slippage pricing based on pool liquidity. In other words: RWA markets need a true trading marketplace, not just a simple liquidity pool. In today's increasingly complex on-chain finance, this design approach is worth paying attention to.