BNB has been on a good rise recently, with the market price hovering around $907. This upward trend is driven by several factors stacking up—accelerated ecosystem development, increased institutional involvement, and upcoming token burns.



Let's look at the highlights. The activity level on the BNB Chain has consistently remained at the forefront, with weekly active addresses reaching 56.4 million. The liquidity of stablecoins is close to $16 billion, indicating that network expansion is indeed accelerating and capital is continuously flowing in. Interestingly, major institutions like Grayscale and VanEck are actively promoting related ETF products, which suggests mainstream acceptance is increasing, and the future investment potential is quite promising.

From a deflationary perspective, the planned token burns in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 are quite substantial—removing over $2.4 billion worth of BNB from circulation. This model can effectively shrink the supply, theoretically supporting the price.

But it's also important to recognize the risks. Technically, although the price trend is upward and moving averages are rising, the MACD has recently shown signs of a bearish crossover, indicating short-term momentum may weaken. A more immediate threat is that BNB is currently stuck in a consolidation zone around $890, with the possibility of a quick short-term drop below $808 to sweep liquidity—if that happens, a stronger rebound could follow.

Another point not to be overlooked: while BNB Chain supports meme coins, this sector is extremely volatile, and the risks for investors are very real.

From community reactions, people are quite optimistic about ecosystem growth, the potential of a "super cycle," and the prospects of ETF approval, with some even calling it the arrival of a "BNB season."
BNB-0,04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityHuntervip
· 9h ago
The price difference from 890 to 808... Wait, I need to calculate the slippage cost. If it really drops to 808, can the liquidity depth hold up? 16 billion USDT liquidity sounds like a lot, but the key is to look at the distribution of trading pairs. Unable to sleep early in the morning and looking at DEX data again, I found that this drop might hide arbitrage opportunities, provided that market efficiency isn't that high yet. A destruction scale of 2.4 billion is indeed impressive, but the question is—can this offset the risk premium of the meme coin ecosystem? The community's call for a BNB season is a bit premature; let's wait for the MACD crossover confirmation first.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 17h ago
Institutional entry + burning, it looks promising, but the MACD has crossed... Can this wave really break through 890 and hold?
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 21h ago
This round of $2.4 billion BNB burn looks like a genuine deflationary move with real guns and knives. Institutions are piling in, with Grayscale and VanEck on board. Mainstream recognition is indeed heating up. However, be cautious of MACD crossover risks. If the level around 890 breaks and drops to 808, it could trigger a liquidity sweep. The meme coin sector is too risky; I'm just watching the show and not participating. How many times have we called for BNB's seasonal rally? Will this time really be different?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 21h ago
Institutional entry + burn expectations, BNB this wave really has something. Just worried that the bearish MACD signal might cause trouble, need to keep a close eye on the 890 level. --- With a batch of ETFs coming out, the mainstream fundraising speed might be much faster than we imagined. --- $2.4 billion in burns sounds impressive, but by 2026 we still don’t know what the market conditions will be like, don’t be fooled by this number. --- The 56.4 million weekly active addresses data is truly attractive, but the risks in meme coins are obvious and unavoidable. --- Those shouting "BNB season," wait until it drops to 808 before they dare to say anything. --- Grayscale and VanEck are both launching ETFs, indicating that major institutions are really interested in this chain. The long-term holding logic makes sense. --- After consolidating in this range for so long, it’s either going to break upward or drop down, just worried about the kind of repeated order sweeping pattern. --- With such high ecosystem activity still increasing, why should I be scared just because MACD looks bearish?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardianvip
· 21h ago
$2.4 billion worth of tokens burned sounds impressive, but how many can actually hold out until then? --- I've long seen the MACD crossover, but this rebound feels a bit fake. --- Grayscale VanEck launching an ETF is a good thing, but don’t be fooled by the story of institutional entry. Be cautious, resistance is above 890. --- Meme coins are really exploding. My friend just went all-in on a memecoin and it’s lost all its value in a week. No matter how strong the BNB chain ecosystem is, it can’t stop this kind of play. --- Hoping to rebound after hitting 808? I doubt it. When such topics appear, they often move in the opposite direction. --- $16 billion in stablecoin liquidity sounds good, but what about outflows? No one talks about that. --- Before the BNB season, check the MACD first. All these stories about technical signals being off are just nonsense. --- Institutions are increasing their positions, and the community is frantically calling for a bull run. When these two happen together, it’s usually time to go short. --- Large-scale token burns are impressive, but that’s all for 2026. For now, just focus on surviving. --- $56.4 million active addresses is indeed impressive, but the question is how many of these are real users versus smart contract wash trading?
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 21h ago
$2.4 billion worth of burns sound great, but can it really hold the 890? Feels like it still needs to drop a bit to sweep liquidity before it can rise.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 21h ago
Institutional entry + dual positive outlook from burning, but the MACD crossover is a bit painful. If the 808 level really breaks, can there be a sharp rebound?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 21h ago
Wait, are GrayScale and VanEck really pushing ETFs? If this happens, BNB will really take off. Wow, $2.4 billion in burns—this力度 (intensity) is quite fierce. When supply contracts, how can the price not rise? But I’m still a bit worried about the MACD bearish signal. It feels like a short-term correction might be coming. Do you believe in the liquidity sweep at $808? Anyway, I’m a little scared of this wave. I’ve already played out meme coins; their volatility is really deadly.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdroppervip
· 21h ago
The ecological data is indeed impressive, but I'm more concerned about how long this wave can last. It feels a bit hollow. BNB season? Let's wait and see. The MACD has already crossed bearish. Don't be fooled by 56.4 million active addresses. Burning 2.4 billion sounds great, but at the critical level of 808, how many people can be swept away? That's the real question. Institutional bottom-fishing? Following the trend? Grayscale is a double-edged sword—either pumping or dumping. The meme coin ecosystem is really crazy right now. Several projects have exploded. With such high risk, who would dare to go all in?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)