The mortgage market has just stirred up a wave, and the US policy focus has shifted back to consumer credit. This week, Trump made a major statement on social media—suggesting that starting from January 20 next year, the cap on credit card interest rates be set at 10% for one year, directly targeting the issue of "excessive charges" by credit card companies.
This proposal is not without precedent; it was part of related commitments during the 2024 campaign, and now it has become a tangible policy signal. However, the reality is less idealistic— the White House has neither provided an implementation plan nor explained how to enforce compliance among financial institutions.
The financial sector immediately erupted in controversy. Hedge fund magnate Bill Ackman, who previously supported Trump, was the first to speak out, calling it a "bad idea." He posed a pointed question: if interest rates are forcibly lowered, how will banks cover their risk costs? How will they ensure shareholder returns? The likely outcome could be—banks collectively cancel consumer credit cards, forcing millions of people into underground high-interest loan markets, which would be truly uncomfortable.
Major issuing banks like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, US Bank, and First Capital remain silent for now, unwilling to be the first to oppose. Industry experts generally believe that without legislative backing from Congress, relying solely on administrative appeals will be difficult to legally bind companies. The ultimate direction of this interest rate tug-of-war still depends on Congress's stance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 17h ago
Another empty promise, this time it's about credit cards. The banks must be laughing to death, haha.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-11 01:55
Another display of a bearish policy, and the banks are ignoring it.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 01-11 01:51
10% interest rate cap? Sounds good, but it’s just not feasible. Without laws or enforcement plans, why would banks listen?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 01-11 01:49
Starting to hype again, this time it's consumer credit being targeted. The 10% interest rate cap sounds good in theory, but how will it be implemented? Banks wouldn't dare cooperate.
The mortgage market has just stirred up a wave, and the US policy focus has shifted back to consumer credit. This week, Trump made a major statement on social media—suggesting that starting from January 20 next year, the cap on credit card interest rates be set at 10% for one year, directly targeting the issue of "excessive charges" by credit card companies.
This proposal is not without precedent; it was part of related commitments during the 2024 campaign, and now it has become a tangible policy signal. However, the reality is less idealistic— the White House has neither provided an implementation plan nor explained how to enforce compliance among financial institutions.
The financial sector immediately erupted in controversy. Hedge fund magnate Bill Ackman, who previously supported Trump, was the first to speak out, calling it a "bad idea." He posed a pointed question: if interest rates are forcibly lowered, how will banks cover their risk costs? How will they ensure shareholder returns? The likely outcome could be—banks collectively cancel consumer credit cards, forcing millions of people into underground high-interest loan markets, which would be truly uncomfortable.
Major issuing banks like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, US Bank, and First Capital remain silent for now, unwilling to be the first to oppose. Industry experts generally believe that without legislative backing from Congress, relying solely on administrative appeals will be difficult to legally bind companies. The ultimate direction of this interest rate tug-of-war still depends on Congress's stance.