2026-01-11 03:29:20

Some rushed calls in the meme token space have sparked heated reactions from holders. Picture this scenario: a community creates a token inspired by a popular meme, the creator offers to take on a CTO role in the project, but the proposition gets sidelined without acknowledgment or follow-up. From the community's perspective, that's a broken agreement with nothing to show for it. When stakeholders feel overlooked or their contributions aren't recognized, you naturally see sentiment shift pretty quickly. It's less about one person's frustration and more about how project governance handles community expectations—when those lines blur, sell-offs tend to follow.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FloorPriceWatcher

· 15h ago

Another failed meme coin, hilarious. --- That's why I never trust projects without a clear governance framework. --- The CTO's promise to release it just like that? No wonder the community is dumping. --- Meme coins have never been reliable, it's all just a scam to harvest retail investors. --- One key question: how do the founders view the community? That’s the core issue. --- Vague promises will eventually have to be fulfilled; it's just a matter of time. --- Sigh, once trust is broken, it can never be restored. Who's the next sucker to buy the dip?

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 15h ago

honestly this is just governance primitives 101 gone wrong... when you don't have explicit role assignment mechanisms or even basic signal-response loops, people fill the void with assumptions. pretty predictable cascade tbh

Reply0

IfIWereOnChain

· 15h ago

It's the same old trick again, promising a bunch and then disappearing. What else can be done? Honestly, someone should have regulated this kind of thing a long time ago. If the CTO can't even provide that, then I already know what your project is like. Not responding is the biggest response; anyone can read that signal. If the breach of agreement happens once or twice and no one pays attention, then this community should disband.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 15h ago

Another meme about scamming investors. Putting the CTO position on hold is a clear signal that the project team hasn't figured out the way forward at all. The community is left hanging; how can their emotions not explode? This is the death spiral of governance.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 15h ago

It's the same old trick, a common problem with meme coins, isn't it? --- The CTO suggests going silent? That's just ridiculous... --- Funny, the community is being ignored like air --- If communication is this bad, how do you expect to keep people? Time to leave --- Always the same, promises go down the drain, then blame the community for not understanding --- Blurred boundaries mean you have to leave, that's the rule --- Really unbelievable, propose something and then there's no response... --- If governance is poor, don't blame the sell-offs, be realistic

View OriginalReply0