2026-01-11 03:31:31

This decision might be problematic. Telling a user base of 600 million to use the product less—this logic is a bit flawed. From a business perspective, it sounds contradictory. Whether it's product adjustments or strategic shifts, directly advising such a massive user base to reduce usage frequency doesn't seem like a smart public statement. The market usually reacts strongly to such remarks, and investors and users will be pondering the true intentions behind it.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 01-11 03:54

ngl the optics here are absolutely catastrophic. telling 600M users to basically *stop* using your product is peak governance theater. empirically speaking, this violates every fundamental principle of user retention metrics. the data suggests whoever greenlit this either didn't run the numbers or... idk, maybe they're trying to orchestrate some kind of protocol health narrative? sketchy af.

Reply0

RealYieldWizard

· 01-11 03:51

Discouraging people from using their own product? This guy is really something else—6 hundred million users directly discouraged. How big must his heart be to pull off such a move?

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-11 03:45

This company is contradicting itself here. Saying "use less" in front of 600 million users? They must have a screw loose.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinMarathoner

· 01-11 03:41

tbh this feels like mile 20 energy—things look backwards until you zoom out on the macro. tell 600m users to touch grass less? that's either genius or catastrophic, no in-between. market's probably just noise anyway, fundamentals don't change on press releases.

Reply0