2026-01-11 05:24:45

Some projects are just steady and not in a rush to go live. Take Soul Protocol as an example—its approach is quite interesting—rather than rushing to issue tokens, it focuses on refining the product first.

Why do I see it this way? Because it addresses the pain points in the cross-chain field. Most cross-chain solutions on the market now prioritize transaction speed, but Soul Protocol's idea is different. It considers how to enable capital to flow naturally and smoothly, with the core focus on solving real problems caused by cross-chain: bridge slippage, security risks, and additional costs.

From the perspective of combining credit and cross-chain, this is a project with a deeper concept. It's not about being fast for the sake of speed, but about solving the fundamental efficiency issues of capital movement across chains. The product is still being refined, but the approach is clear. Such an attitude is particularly rare nowadays. Build slowly, verify gradually—only in this way can truly competitive products be created.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-11 09:22

I respect the fact that you're not rushing to issue tokens. Really, too many projects are coming in the wrong order nowadays. This logic indeed holds up. Everyone knows about slippage and security risks, but no one takes them seriously. Good work takes time, but I'm just worried it might be too slow...

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHobo

· 01-11 05:54

Taking the time to do quality work—that's what Web3 should look like. --- Another project that is truly getting things done, not just talking on paper. --- Slippage, security risks, and these pain points do exist. It's rare to see someone take them seriously. --- Wait, hold on, you're hyping it up before the product even launches? Let's wait and see. --- Compared to those who are constantly issuing tokens for fundraising, Soul Protocol's approach is indeed clear-headed. --- Capital flow efficiency... To put it nicely, it's just trying to solve the garbage cross-chain experience. --- Scarcity is truly scarce, but how long will it take to refine it to perfection? --- This is what it means to have a broad vision—not being hostage to the anxiety of token issuance.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 01-11 05:53

Really, projects that don't rush the trend are actually more reassuring. --- Cross-chain slippage is indeed a big problem; most are pretending not to see it. --- Taking time to do quality work is a pity that not many project teams understand. --- Those who only think about listing tokens quickly should have died long ago; this is the correct way to open up. --- Capital flow efficiency? Nice words, but it all depends on whether they can really deliver. --- Agreed, not issuing tokens is actually more worth paying attention to. --- This approach is definitely much better than those who shout about fundraising every day. --- Slippage, security, and costs are all pain points; finally, someone is taking them seriously. --- The combination of credit and cross-chain? That's quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 01-11 05:51

Finally, I see one that doesn't cut leeks, feels good.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 01-11 05:48

Honestly, there are still projects that dare to take their time and do quality work without rushing to make a quick profit. They are quite rare. However, the issue of cross-chain slippage is indeed annoying... Let's see if Soul Protocol can truly solve it, and not just be another PPT project. It's somewhat interesting, but it still depends on what the final product will look like.

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 01-11 05:42

Honestly, such projects are indeed rare, and it's really not about chasing the trend. --- I'm impressed with the product polishing. There are too many rug pulls nowadays. --- The slippage cost hits a nerve. I just want to know how they plan to solve it. --- Taking your time to do quality work is much more reliable than those rushing to raise funds. --- Let's wait until the product is truly launched before making any claims. Don't hype it up too much first. --- The cross-chain track definitely needs someone to do it well. Keep it up! --- Capital flow efficiency? Sounds like they're solving real problems. --- I like this attitude. Web3 is really lacking in this aspect. --- Compared to daily airdrops, I prefer a solid team that works steadily. --- The combination of credit and cross-chain is something I haven't seen before.

View OriginalReply0

ForkInTheRoad

· 01-11 05:33

Hey, wait a minute. Projects like this are really rare. Usually, they issue tokens first and then talk about it. Honestly, solving slippage is much more important than speed. The bridges nowadays are too scammy. Wait, can this thing really solve cross-chain cost issues? I'm a bit interested. I trust projects that are refined over time. They're more reliable than those that hype up right from the start. It's quite rare. No rush to cut profits, so I’ll just wait.

View OriginalReply0