An interesting question: Crypto Twitter, abbreviated as CT, has now rebranded to X on Twitter. Should it be renamed to CX?

It sounds like a joke, but the underlying real issue is quite painful—CT is indeed in decline.

Why is that? Many people flood DC and X daily with "gm" replies to boost their presence, but their followers can't see their truly important messages. Project teams interact wildly with the community early on, but when it comes to token airdrop announcements, their exposure is disastrous, and the community quickly cools off. Isn't this just shooting oneself in the foot?

The core problem lies in the algorithm. Users only see 20-30 posts a day, but those meaningless "Good morning" replies take up the platform's exposure quota. Once the algorithm limits the flow, your major messages are completely buried. It's like drinking poison to quench thirst—trying to grow by flooding the platform, but ending up killing your own exposure.

Even more ironically, trust on the internet itself is also problematic. Some delete truthful statements, AI generates falsehoods, and now everything relies on screenshots and "Trust me" to judge, making it impossible to verify the truth.

How to solve this? It requires technology to strengthen authenticity—combining blockchain with cryptographic signatures and identity verification, so every piece of information has a traceable source, and the truth can be permanently verified. This is the future direction that social ecosystems should take.