2026-01-11 23:34:09

The algorithm mechanism of Platform X has once again sparked attention. According to industry insiders, X has set a ceiling on the average daily exposure per account, which means that users who frequently post content will paradoxically face a decline in exposure. This discovery is somewhat ironic for content creators and project teams — in an era that pursues high-frequency interaction, the platform is secretly limiting your voice.

What is the logic behind this algorithm setting? Is it to ensure content diversity, or is there another deeper intention? For Web3 projects that rely on social media dissemination, this undoubtedly increases the difficulty of information reach. Users need to rethink their content strategies rather than blindly pursue posting frequency. In an age of information explosion, only those who understand platform rules can truly gain the voice.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PonziWhisperer

· 10h ago

No wonder nobody was watching what I posted recently; turns out X is up to something here. But on the other hand, this tactic is actually quite clever; only those who understand the platform are the winners. Frequent posting leads to suppression? Then I need to change my strategy—quality over quantity. So, those projects that flood the feed every day are just shooting themselves in the foot. This is the reality of Web3; you have to learn to "play the game" with the platform. Interesting, X is teaching us what real gameplay is.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 01-12 07:20

Can't keep going, X's tactic is just to make us spend money on promotion.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-12 00:03

After all that effort, I ended up getting rolled back secretly. This move is brilliant. No wonder those guys who post ten times a day have been silent lately.

View OriginalReply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 01-12 00:03

Coming back with this again? The more you send, the more you're suppressed? What's the point of playing then, haha.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-12 00:00

I should have realized this earlier: platforms are not only profiting from the "cutting leeks" strategy but also choking you at the same time. This logic was actually played out in the crypto world years ago, and now it's moved to social media. On the surface, it claims to promote diversity, but in reality, it controls the flow of information—your frequent posts are actually suppressed. It's like supply lines being cut on the battlefield; the more you struggle, the more dangerous it becomes. The key is not how much you post, but the quality and rhythm. I've seen too many project teams baffled by these rules, still bombarding with content. What they should learn is the silence tactic—one post is worth ten. Web3 is even more challenging. Information is already easy to get drowned out, and now platforms are secretly setting ceilings. The computing power battle has escalated into a psychological war. Those who understand the rules survive, and the rest become cannon fodder.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiWarrior

· 01-11 23:59

Sending more content is useless; the platform has already fixed you. I've known this trick for a long time; this is the real way to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 01-11 23:48

Burning out and overworking oneself, in the end, still gets stuck by the platform's algorithm, hilarious

View OriginalReply0