My approach? Pick something in crypto that truly fascinates you—could be mining infrastructure, blockchain scalability, or prediction market mechanics—then commit hard. Really hard. Stay with it long enough to accumulate knowledge that most people never bother building. The goal isn't dabbling. It's becoming genuinely expert, the kind of person others turn to when the questions get technical. Hashpower, blockspace allocation, on-chain prediction systems—these fields need people who've actually studied them at depth, not just skimmed Twitter threads. That's where real credibility lives.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapist
· 5h ago
Well said, but most people simply can't stick with it this deeply.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 5h ago
That's quite true, but the reality is that most people just want to make money quickly, without much in-depth research.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 5h ago
Deep learning is the way to go, it's amazing. Most people just scratch the surface, no wonder they keep getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 5h ago
That's right, but most people can't do this.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinner
· 5h ago
Honestly, deep diving into this approach sounds great, but how many people actually stick with it?
My approach? Pick something in crypto that truly fascinates you—could be mining infrastructure, blockchain scalability, or prediction market mechanics—then commit hard. Really hard. Stay with it long enough to accumulate knowledge that most people never bother building. The goal isn't dabbling. It's becoming genuinely expert, the kind of person others turn to when the questions get technical. Hashpower, blockspace allocation, on-chain prediction systems—these fields need people who've actually studied them at depth, not just skimmed Twitter threads. That's where real credibility lives.