Why do early crypto projects make such questionable decisions? The culprit often lies in brutal cash constraints. These startups are under immense pressure to prove viability, so they're forced into an awkward position: distribute token value immediately to show "we're serious about this." It's a survival move, but not necessarily the smartest one. In theory, a more logical strategy would involve pacing token releases differently—building sustainable value over time rather than front-loading distribution to win early credibility. The tension here is real: immediate legitimacy versus long-term economic health. Most projects facing runway pressures simply can't afford to wait.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyOnMainnet
· 34m ago
We've been forced into a corner; either prove ourselves now or wait for death—there's no other choice.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 4h ago
ngl this is the curse of crypto, rushing to prove yourself ends up trapping you instead
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 4h ago
ngl, this is just the eternal battle between staying alive now vs. not nuking your tokenomics later. seen too many projects slashing their validator set because they couldn't resist front-loading distribution... poor stake economics management tbh
Reply0
LiquidityWitch
· 4h ago
ngl this is a dead loop, without money, you have to疯狂分币 to maintain popularity, who can wait?
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 4h ago
ngl, this is the dead cycle of the crypto world... rushing to raise funds to prove oneself, but ended up destroying the token.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 4h ago
NGL, this is the reality. If you don't have money, you have to spend coins to gain popularity. Long-term planning is a luxury for well-funded projects.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 4h ago
ngl this is the dead cycle of the crypto world. Trying to prove yourself quickly ends up killing the project.
Why do early crypto projects make such questionable decisions? The culprit often lies in brutal cash constraints. These startups are under immense pressure to prove viability, so they're forced into an awkward position: distribute token value immediately to show "we're serious about this." It's a survival move, but not necessarily the smartest one. In theory, a more logical strategy would involve pacing token releases differently—building sustainable value over time rather than front-loading distribution to win early credibility. The tension here is real: immediate legitimacy versus long-term economic health. Most projects facing runway pressures simply can't afford to wait.