Last week, Ripple Labs sent a direct letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Task Force, outlining their views on legal issues in the cryptocurrency market.
In the letter, Ripple argued that using the concept of “decentralized” as a legal criterion is inappropriate, as it is not a clear binary state and creates too much uncertainty. The company also emphasized that considering an asset as a security solely because investors expect passive price appreciation is a flawed approach, as speculation exists in all markets.
Ripple particularly supports the Clarity Act, viewing it as an important legal foundation for widespread adoption, while also helping their stablecoin RLUSD meet compliance requirements. Ripple’s arguments are expected to significantly influence the future of crypto regulation in the U.S.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Ripple refutes decentralization claims in a letter to the SEC
Last week, Ripple Labs sent a direct letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Task Force, outlining their views on legal issues in the cryptocurrency market.
In the letter, Ripple argued that using the concept of “decentralized” as a legal criterion is inappropriate, as it is not a clear binary state and creates too much uncertainty. The company also emphasized that considering an asset as a security solely because investors expect passive price appreciation is a flawed approach, as speculation exists in all markets.
Ripple particularly supports the Clarity Act, viewing it as an important legal foundation for widespread adoption, while also helping their stablecoin RLUSD meet compliance requirements. Ripple’s arguments are expected to significantly influence the future of crypto regulation in the U.S.