looks like the metaverse sector won't have to worry about funding anytime soon—mag7's backing pretty much guarantees capital will keep flowing in. whether that's good or bad for actual innovation is another question entirely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerForever
· 20h ago
That's how capital works. When there's too much money, it tends to cause problems. Are those metaverse projects really innovating, or are they just burning investors' money?
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 20h ago
The era of innovation built on capital is like this—money so abundant there's nowhere to spend it.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 20h ago
Honestly, pouring money into mag7 is a double-edged sword... Sufficient capital ≠ true innovation, and it can even lead to a bunch of fake demand and garbage projects.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 20h ago
Nah, that's the problem. Having too much money kills innovation. Just watch.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 20h ago
Having more money often leads to more problems; it's too common to see innovation drowned out by money...
looks like the metaverse sector won't have to worry about funding anytime soon—mag7's backing pretty much guarantees capital will keep flowing in. whether that's good or bad for actual innovation is another question entirely.