2026-01-13 15:22:25

The attention on Creator Chain clearly increases as TGE approaches. The more I delve into it, the more I feel that this project has a fundamentally different logic from other L2s.

To put it simply, most Web3 creator platforms on the market are just a few approaches—tool upgrades, increased revenue sharing, optimized experience. They are all trying to attract creators to use them. But Creator Chain's approach is completely different.

It is not about building an application-layer tool for creators, but about directly reconstructing the underlying infrastructure for creators. In other words, creators should not just be users of a platform, but should become native participants of the entire chain. This difference in positioning determines that the ceiling of the entire project is completely different.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 7h ago

Innovations at the infrastructure level are indeed different; this is the true differentiation in competition.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 7h ago

This approach is indeed quite different; the underlying logic restructuring sounds more solid. But can it really be implemented? It seems to still depend on the execution after TGE.

View OriginalReply0

MetaReckt

· 7h ago

This idea is indeed brilliant, it feels like finally someone is doing it right. --- Wait, can this really be implemented? Or is it just another PPT dream? --- I've heard this underlying infrastructure set many times, but the key is who can truly execute it properly. --- Creators becoming native participants? Sounds great, but how to distribute rights so that big players don't cut in? --- Unlike other L2s, this angle is indeed fresh. Let's see if it can survive after TGE. --- Finally, a project that has thought through this issue. Others are just competing over tools and dividing the pie. --- This logic is indeed a higher dimension than projects that just "give creators more money." --- Having a different ceiling is possible, but the prerequisite is having users, brother. --- Just the right kind of project that values this mindset. Looking forward.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 7h ago

There's something there. Finally, a project understands this logic.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 7h ago

Is the idea of underlying infrastructure really brilliant, but can it actually be implemented? I've heard this logic too many times, and in the end, it still turns into an air project. Original participant creators? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might turn into another scythe feast. Wait, can it really be better than other L2s? I'm a bit tempted. No hype, no blackening. If it can truly empower creators, it’s worth it. By the way, when is TGE? Let me see if there's a whitelist. It's another infrastructure rebuild; this phrase has become numbingly common. The key is whether creators will actually use it. Don’t let it turn out that no one plays with it.

View OriginalReply0