2026-01-13 16:25:42

Siyuan naturally has the right to choose whether to accept donations or to burn tokens, which is a fundamental autonomy of the project. However, it should be clear that many donors in the community genuinely support HappySci's direction. They use the purchase of tokens as a way to vote and support, which is not purely speculative — if they just wanted to make quick money, they would have already pursued other projects.

Based on this respect for the donors' original intentions, Flap is now building a verifiable donation mechanism. The core of this system is to make every donation transparent and traceable, allowing contributors who truly support the project's vision to be recognized, while also enabling community members to clearly understand the flow and use of funds. This way, it not only protects the trust of donors but also strengthens the cohesion of the community.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren.eth

· 4h ago

Speaking of this transparent mechanism, it sounds good, but I don't know how long it can last. True believers and speculators definitely need to be viewed separately, I agree. Verifiable donations? This feels like the kind of Web3 we should have. However, the execution capability of HappySci still needs to be observed. Funds flow can be tracked, at least much better than before, I give this point a thumbs up.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 4h ago

I truly support this idea; a transparent mechanism is the lifeline of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 4h ago

I truly support this idea; a transparent mechanism is so important for building trust. --- Donors' original intentions really shouldn't be ignored; there needs to be a verifiable way to record these contributions. --- In simple terms, let the on-chain data speak, so community members know what's going on. --- If this mechanism can really be implemented, could it become a reference standard for other projects? --- Turning donors from anonymous to visible is the greatest respect we can give them. --- Funds transparency is verifiable... sounds simple, but implementing it might take some time. --- I'm a bit curious about what the Flap system will actually look like. --- This is much more conscientious than those projects that just cut corners for quick gains. --- Verifiable donation records allow true believers to be seen, and that's a good idea. --- Finally, someone is taking community trust seriously.

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 4h ago

Transparency mechanisms really need to be implemented, or else donors will always have doubts.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiGrayling

· 4h ago

Genuine supporters and speculators can tell at a glance, and Flap has got this down. Having a transparent mechanism in place is more convincing than any flowery words.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractDiver

· 4h ago

Speaking of true believers and speculators, they can really see through it at a glance. Those who stick to this project must have already accepted the mindset. The verifiable mechanism sounds good; with increased transparency, trust will naturally follow. It's just unknown how effective the execution will be.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 4h ago

Transparency mechanisms need to be implemented, but honestly, can this system be realized? --- Donors are truly believers, no doubt, but the problem is that the funds' usage is still a muddled account. --- Verifiable donations? Just listen, the key is execution. --- Finally, someone hit the nail on the head. Trust is so easily squandered. --- Now everyone talks about transparency and cohesion, but in the end, how the money is spent still depends on the project team. --- Support this direction, but don't just talk without action. --- Clarifying the flow of funds should indeed be a top priority.

View OriginalReply0