A price point of 300k is a good opportunity to get in, but the prerequisite is that the development team is still actively pushing forward. The key issue is that once this project attracts institutional attention, a rapid surge could be just around the corner. By then, it will be a different story to enter, with completely different costs. The current dilemma is finding a balance between waiting and getting on board — whether to patiently wait for a price correction or to risk chasing the high by entering early. If the project itself still has vitality, early involvement might be more cost-effective than being forced to buy at a higher price.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDay
· 2h ago
300k is really a hurdle, but to be honest, I just can't tell if the team still has the motivation to keep going.
When institutions come in, they pump the market; I'm tired of this routine... Waiting for a pullback in the morning is still difficult, this problem is even harder than choosing a wife.
View OriginalReply0
NFTFreezer
· 4h ago
Once institutions come in, it's game over; retail investors will all be left holding the bag.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 4h ago
300k in? It depends on whether the team is really slacking off or actually working. That's the threshold.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 4h ago
It's really just about whether the gambling team keeps causing trouble. If they bet wrong, they end up as a bag holder.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 4h ago
Whenever institutions arrive, you have to run, that's just fate... 300k still depends on whether the team is reliable or not.
A price point of 300k is a good opportunity to get in, but the prerequisite is that the development team is still actively pushing forward. The key issue is that once this project attracts institutional attention, a rapid surge could be just around the corner. By then, it will be a different story to enter, with completely different costs. The current dilemma is finding a balance between waiting and getting on board — whether to patiently wait for a price correction or to risk chasing the high by entering early. If the project itself still has vitality, early involvement might be more cost-effective than being forced to buy at a higher price.