It seems to have many features and looks very cool, but in reality, the team has put real effort into speed and focus. Don't be fooled by the surface; the more you use it, the more you'll notice the attention to detail in the design. Those seemingly flashy features are all aimed at helping you improve trading efficiency. The team is indeed capable, but they are used to being low-key and don't usually show off their muscles to everyone.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NullWhisperer
· 7h ago
nah actually the real test is whether those "efficiency gains" hold up under load. seen plenty of teams talk a good game about architecture before everything goes sideways at scale.
Reply0
AirdropJunkie
· 7h ago
I prefer a low-key team; it's much more reliable than those who boast every day.
View OriginalReply0
BoredStaker
· 7h ago
A low-key team is the best—just get the work done without bragging.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWallet
· 7h ago
Details are the key, and this team knows their stuff.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 8h ago
I've heard this kind of rhetoric before. In 2018, there were projects that boasted about details and efficiency like this, but what happened? They ran away. Only the contract audit report counts.
It seems to have many features and looks very cool, but in reality, the team has put real effort into speed and focus. Don't be fooled by the surface; the more you use it, the more you'll notice the attention to detail in the design. Those seemingly flashy features are all aimed at helping you improve trading efficiency. The team is indeed capable, but they are used to being low-key and don't usually show off their muscles to everyone.