Recently, I noticed an interesting phenomenon—some projects have launched on-chain US stock trading products like STOCK, allowing users to directly trade tokenized assets of top US companies such as Tesla and Apple on the blockchain. Although the market capitalization is still small and there are cases of oversubscription, this direction is quite intriguing.
Even more interesting is that traditional financial institutions are starting to experiment as well. For example, Interactive Brokers, a well-established brokerage, has recently enabled USDC deposits, indicating that Web2 financial giants are also sensing the opportunities in Web3.
However, while delving into tax issues, I discovered a key point—under the domestic CRS framework, there is indeed a 10-year retrospective period. This means that participating in US stock trading within Web3 involves significant tax compliance considerations. Conversely, these compliance complexities actually make Web3-based US stock trading more flexible and advantageous compared to traditional channels—if you understand the rules clearly, many trading scenarios can be handled more effectively.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 16h ago
The path of on-chain US stocks is indeed being paved, but you need to understand the tax pitfalls clearly yourself.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 16h ago
Interactive Brokers' move to accept USDC is interesting, indicating that traditional brokerages are also feeling the pressure. However, serious players have already been paying attention to tax issues; the 10-year look-back period is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 16h ago
Ha, STOCK is really interesting. Trading US stocks on-chain sounds pretty cool, but I'm a bit tired of the overfunding issue.
Interactive Brokers is also here. The traditional giants finally can't hold back, which is indeed a signal.
Regarding taxes... I also saw the 10-year audit period. To be honest, it's a bit exhausting, but upon reflection, the flexibility of Web3 might actually be an advantage? I get this logic.
Recently, I noticed an interesting phenomenon—some projects have launched on-chain US stock trading products like STOCK, allowing users to directly trade tokenized assets of top US companies such as Tesla and Apple on the blockchain. Although the market capitalization is still small and there are cases of oversubscription, this direction is quite intriguing.
Even more interesting is that traditional financial institutions are starting to experiment as well. For example, Interactive Brokers, a well-established brokerage, has recently enabled USDC deposits, indicating that Web2 financial giants are also sensing the opportunities in Web3.
However, while delving into tax issues, I discovered a key point—under the domestic CRS framework, there is indeed a 10-year retrospective period. This means that participating in US stock trading within Web3 involves significant tax compliance considerations. Conversely, these compliance complexities actually make Web3-based US stock trading more flexible and advantageous compared to traditional channels—if you understand the rules clearly, many trading scenarios can be handled more effectively.