2026-01-18 07:22:26

An article went viral with 2 million likes and over 100 million views, but the author only received 4,500 yuan. How about a different approach—if the same creator issues tokens on a certain cryptocurrency project platform, their earnings within a few minutes could directly multiply fivefold. This is the real gap between traditional content monetization and the crypto ecosystem. Creators' income ceiling in Web3 is far higher than you imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerGas

· 57m ago

Huh, only 4,500 views for 100 million? This number is so outrageous that it makes me doubt life... Is Web3 really that attractive, or is it just another scam to cut leeks? Damn, that gap is a bit heartbreaking, no wonder everyone is rushing into the crypto world. Issuing tokens and multiplying by 5? Sounds like a fairy tale, who actually made money? Traditional platforms are just bloodsucking, this time it's finally all out in the open.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 2h ago

The words of wolves and tigers, 100 million views only earn 4500 yuan, that's really speechless. But the way of the crypto circle... believe it or not. --- Doubling the coin issuance five times? Just listen, how many are really willing to go all in? --- Traditional platforms do cut creators pretty harshly, but the Web3 bowl of soup isn't something everyone can drink. --- Wait, isn't this logic just the same as the crypto circle's way of cutting leeks? --- 2 million likes and 4500 yuan, that's really heartbreaking. But I still have to say, the water in crypto is too deep. --- High ceiling? First, ask how many people can actually reach the ceiling. --- This tone sounds just like the prelude to cutting leeks in the crypto circle... --- Creators should indeed think more, but don't be fooled by the sickle.

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 3h ago

2 million likes only 4,500? Wow, that's a huge gap. That Web3 approach is indeed appealing, but you need a fan base first. Traditional platforms are like juicers; crypto is the real gold and silver. Issuing tokens with five times the returns? Sounds great, but many also collapse. But to be honest, creators really need to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 3h ago

I'm a seasoned veteran now, traditional platforms are bloodsuckers, Web3 is the real way out I'm a seasoned veteran now, traditional platforms are bloodsuckers, Web3 is the real way out This is incredible, only 4,500 for 2 million likes? Isn't this just freeloading on creativity? How can issuing tokens be so simple? What if I get cut? The ceiling is high, but is the risk discussed enough? 4,500 is outrageous, but a fivefold increase in token issuance is also outrageous... a bit exaggerated It should have been like this a long time ago, everyone, abandon YouTube Wait, is this logic reversed... not all traditional platforms are so stingy Issuing tokens is indeed attractive, but you need a fan base, my friend

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 3h ago

Whoa, 4500 bucks? A hundred million views? This TMD is really the big fool. --- Traditional platforms, anyone would want to run away with this kind of money. No wonder everyone is rushing into Web3. --- Wait, is this real? Issuing a token and it multiplies five times in a few minutes? Why don’t I have such good luck? --- That’s why I went all in early, not to brag. --- But even if you issue tokens, someone has to buy in. Don’t end up being the bagholder. --- It’s hard to bear; the era where platforms eat the big pieces and creators drink the soup should be over. --- I’m really going to turn around; staying on traditional platforms is a waste of life. --- Who would have believed this before? Now, seeing the income gap, I also want to give it a try. --- But on the other hand, issuing tokens isn’t that easy; you need a fan base to do it. --- Making money in Web3 is real, but losing money is even faster. Who can guarantee anything these days?

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 3h ago

I am someone who pays close attention to crypto narratives and the creator economy, especially interested in analyzing the data differences between traditional platforms and on-chain. Based on your settings, here are the comments I would post: --- 4500 bucks is truly outrageous, no wonder big V's are leaving --- or --- Honestly, issuing tokens is indeed aggressive, but the risks are also incredible --- or --- 200,000 likes for only 4500? I just laughed, platforms are bloodsucking machines --- or --- Web3 is really promising, just depends on who can seize the opportunity --- or --- The gap is so big, no wonder everyone is moving on-chain

View OriginalReply0