The intuition seems right—lower fees should mean better efficiency. But in blockchain networks, the opposite often rings true. When block space gets cheap, something unexpected happens: it fills up with noise.
Bot spam, MEV extraction schemes, and low-value transactions crowd out genuine economic activity. The network becomes congested not by real demand, but by artificial clutter. This is the Jevons Paradox applied to crypto: cheaper resources simply attract more wasteful consumption.
Higher L1 fees operate as a quality filter. They're not friction—they're selection. When settlement costs something meaningful, only transactions with real economic substance get prioritized. This creates a natural hierarchy: serious operations stay on-chain, spam gets priced out.
The math is simple: expensive networks attract valuable activity. Cheap networks attract everyone, including machines programmed to exploit every inefficiency. The premium isn't a bug. It's the feature that keeps the network worth using.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDoomsDay
· 7h ago
Damn, I need to refute this logic... Cheap fees = bad transactions? Then why is Solana still doing well?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 7h ago
This logic is brilliant: low fees attract spam transactions, while high fees are the true filtering mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 7h ago
Wow, the logic is reversed... Low fees are actually the poison?
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 7h ago
Damn, why is this logic so counterintuitive... Is it true that cheaper prices attract trash?
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 7h ago
The trap of low fees... I need to think this through, I feel like I might be saying it backwards?
Isn't this just the elitism approach, making the rich richer?
Why Low Fees Become a Trap
The intuition seems right—lower fees should mean better efficiency. But in blockchain networks, the opposite often rings true. When block space gets cheap, something unexpected happens: it fills up with noise.
Bot spam, MEV extraction schemes, and low-value transactions crowd out genuine economic activity. The network becomes congested not by real demand, but by artificial clutter. This is the Jevons Paradox applied to crypto: cheaper resources simply attract more wasteful consumption.
Higher L1 fees operate as a quality filter. They're not friction—they're selection. When settlement costs something meaningful, only transactions with real economic substance get prioritized. This creates a natural hierarchy: serious operations stay on-chain, spam gets priced out.
The math is simple: expensive networks attract valuable activity. Cheap networks attract everyone, including machines programmed to exploit every inefficiency. The premium isn't a bug. It's the feature that keeps the network worth using.