Currently, truly visionary projects are indeed scarce. Many teams promise incentives, but very few are actually implemented. Recently, I came across a project in the AI field, and its core idea is worth pondering: prioritizing the reward system for builders rather than addressing issues retroactively.



The logic behind this actually reflects the dilemma of the entire AI ecosystem. Currently, most AI systems require users to blindly accept output results, lacking verification mechanisms. This project's approach is to break this trust black box—by introducing verifiable mechanisms that allow users to confirm the AI's decision-making process.

For developers who are genuinely building within the ecosystem, this transparent incentive model, combined with the project's innovation in AI verification, indeed offers different possibilities. Standing out among many projects requires this principled and action-oriented attitude.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 6h ago
To be honest, I've seen many projects hype up this kind of upfront incentive logic, but they all end up abandoned. It all depends on execution. If they truly make the verification mechanism transparent? Then I might believe it. Another AI and incentive project—have any of these taken off?
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_earlyvip
· 6h ago
I agree with the idea of prioritizing an incentive system, but how many can truly stick to it? Look at how many projects sound good but ultimately end up just harvesting profits from investors. The key still lies in execution.
View OriginalReply0
PositionPhobiavip
· 6h ago
Honestly, there are not many projects that prioritize incentive mechanisms first. Most are just empty promises, but at least this AI project has thought it through. Without real skills, it's impossible to verify the AI's decision-making process. The technical aspects are quite well considered. To be honest, I haven't seen many projects that achieve transparent incentives; either they truly have execution capability... If the incentive mechanism is well designed early on, there would be much less arguing later. The issue of outputting results as a black box definitely needs to be improved, but those that can truly verify... hmm, still observing. Many projects are just idealistic without execution, but at least this one is not just talk and no action.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 6h ago
The words sound nice, but I haven't really seen a project that can truly implement incentives effectively. Wait, a verifiable AI decision-making process? That sounds pretty good, finally someone thought of this. Pre-allocating rewards for builders is indeed a fresh idea, but the key still depends on execution—don't let it become just empty talk. I feel this is what Web3 should be doing—transparency > all the flowery words. Thinking back to the incentive promises of those previous projects... how are they doing now? Sorry, I won't mention names. If this project can truly verify the AI process, then it's definitely worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)