Recent developments involving senior Federal Reserve officials have attracted industry attention. The current chair's term will end on May 15, but his status as one of the seven board members is complex—board members serve independently and will continue until January 2028.
The key question here is: will he, like almost all previous Federal Reserve chairs in history, step down completely, or will he be an exception and remain on the board? If he does stay, it will be the first time in nearly 50 years.
Why is this issue so closely watched? Many industry insiders point out that the investigations into his certain testimonies may actually involve political pressure. The underlying logic is clear: if he remains on the board, the White House cannot secure a majority seat. This directly affects whether the current administration can exert greater influence over the institution—and for decades, the Federal Reserve has maintained a significant degree of independence.
A former senior economist at the Federal Reserve and a senior researcher at a research institution once said, "I don't think he will leave early. The current situation poses a threat to the governance structure of the Federal Reserve, which has been familiar to us for 90 years. He should take this seriously and see continuing to serve as a director as a responsibility."
Now 72 years old, he was appointed as Federal Reserve Chair in 2018, and his second four-year term faces various uncertainties. The outcome of this game will not only determine the future direction of the Federal Reserve but also influence expectations across the entire financial market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChain_Detective
· 13h ago
ngl this reeks of institutional power consolidation patterns... flag it
Reply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 13h ago
Haha, it's another palace intrigue drama of the Federal Reserve. This time, they're really here to stir up trouble.
Haven't seen this kind of scene in 50 years, kind of looking forward to it.
Waiting for the White House and the Federal Reserve to clash, betting on a Bitcoin—he wouldn't dare leave.
Political pressure is overwhelming; they talk about "independence," but it's all business.
If this guy really stays on, it would be a game-changer; the financial markets would be trembling.
Not leaving? Then get ready to be scolded until 2028, haha.
If this move succeeds, the future days for the chairmen will be tough.
The Federal Reserve's affairs, to put it plainly, are a power game. No wonder traders are all nervous.
Listen, this is the real underworld plot.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 13h ago
Basically, it's a political game. The independence of the Federal Reserve is becoming increasingly difficult.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 13h ago
If this guy doesn't leave, the Federal Reserve will really blow up.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 13h ago
If you can't afford to play, then don't play. It's just a political game.
Recent developments involving senior Federal Reserve officials have attracted industry attention. The current chair's term will end on May 15, but his status as one of the seven board members is complex—board members serve independently and will continue until January 2028.
The key question here is: will he, like almost all previous Federal Reserve chairs in history, step down completely, or will he be an exception and remain on the board? If he does stay, it will be the first time in nearly 50 years.
Why is this issue so closely watched? Many industry insiders point out that the investigations into his certain testimonies may actually involve political pressure. The underlying logic is clear: if he remains on the board, the White House cannot secure a majority seat. This directly affects whether the current administration can exert greater influence over the institution—and for decades, the Federal Reserve has maintained a significant degree of independence.
A former senior economist at the Federal Reserve and a senior researcher at a research institution once said, "I don't think he will leave early. The current situation poses a threat to the governance structure of the Federal Reserve, which has been familiar to us for 90 years. He should take this seriously and see continuing to serve as a director as a responsibility."
Now 72 years old, he was appointed as Federal Reserve Chair in 2018, and his second four-year term faces various uncertainties. The outcome of this game will not only determine the future direction of the Federal Reserve but also influence expectations across the entire financial market.