2026-01-18 08:27:23

There's a shift happening in how we fund builders. Forget just glamorizing product launches—what if we actually paid developers for the unglamorous work that keeps everything running?

Case in point: a $150k creator fund launched recently that gets it. Instead of chasing hype, the platform focuses on what really matters in production—versioned deploys, state-aware previews, canary rollouts, and one-click rollback capabilities. All accessible from a single interface.

It's a small but telling sign. The market is starting to recognize that operational excellence and developer infrastructure matter just as much as flashy features. The boring stuff? That's where real value gets built.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeDodger

· 1h ago

Someone finally said it: these infrastructure tasks are indeed seriously underestimated. 150k for these things? Honestly, it's not a lot, but as long as the attitude is right. Really, compared to those flashy new features, stability is the key.

View OriginalReply0

memecoin_therapy

· 01-18 08:57

Well said, finally someone understands. Anyone can boast about flashy features, but the real skill is in stabilizing the infrastructure. I don't understand why so many teams in the past only focused on storytelling, only for the product to fail after launch. The 150k fund thing isn't a big deal, but the direction is right. Boring work is valuable; this should be engraved in the minds of all founders.

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 01-18 08:57

Finally someone spoke out, this is the right path for web3 --- The 150k fund focusing on operations and maintenance... I just want to ask why other platforms are still competing in marketing --- Boring tasks are actually the most profitable, I love this logic --- Versioned deployment, rollback and other features may seem small, but they have saved countless developers' lives --- Really, compared to those flashy new features, what we need is stability --- This is pragmatic, unlike some projects that shout concepts every day --- Wait, does this mean that developers working on infrastructure can get normal income in the future? --- Finally seeing a platform take developers' workload seriously, not just hype concepts --- One-click rollback functions, no one pays attention to them, but once you don't have it, you're doomed

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 01-18 08:52

To be honest, this is more like it... Nobody wants to do the infrastructure work, but someone has to. Now finally, someone is willing to pay for these "boring tasks." ngl, spending 150k on versioned deployment and rollback tasks is much more reliable than most projects boasting about new features.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 01-18 08:39

Someone finally said it—the maintenance work is truly the gold mine. Really, who doesn't want to work on shiny new features, but when issues occur online, having someone who can quickly roll back is a lifesaver. Spending 150k on this is worth it, much better than piling up features with little use.

View OriginalReply0

MetaReckt

· 01-18 08:32

Honestly, only 150k can get infrastructure attention? Web3 still has to keep pushing forward.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c799715c

· 01-18 08:28

150k fund for infrastructure, this is truly awakening. Don't mess around with those flashy things; stability is the key.

View OriginalReply0