There is a viewpoint that not everyone may agree with, but it’s worth mentioning:
Projects like $XPL$ do not rely on emotional hype. Every step of its progress—from payment systems and clearing mechanisms to compliance integration—is a slow variable, making it difficult to generate continuous price stimulation. This also means that if you’re waiting for a surge, you’re probably going to be disappointed.
But from another perspective, this very characteristic makes it stand out:
**Using time to gain certainty** — not relying on stories or hot topics, but on solid functional iterations and ecosystem development.
**Using real usage to tell the narrative** — no fancy tricks, only step-by-step validation of feasibility in payment and settlement scenarios.
So the key question becomes: in the race for stablecoin infrastructure, who will ultimately survive? If this question piques your interest, the Plasma ecosystem is worth adding to your observation list.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSleepDeprived
· 6h ago
Slow variables are just slow variables. How can you raise funds if you can't move the coin price?
---
Honestly, I feel the probability of projects like this surviving in the end is not high; the infrastructure is too boring.
---
Wait, with the so competitive stablecoin track, what makes XPL think it can win?
---
Projects that rely on practical applications rather than stories are really a minority in the crypto world, and this is something that must be acknowledged.
---
I just want to ask, how can you attract funds without hot spots for rotation? This logic doesn't hold.
---
Using time to exchange for certainty sounds very advanced, but holders probably can't wait that long.
---
Compliance docking sounds good, but I haven't seen any truly implemented ones.
---
Plasma ecosystem? Let's first see if there is real trading volume before talking.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 6h ago
Being slow is a characteristic, not a flaw. Those who still can't tell the difference are waiting for tenfold coins.
---
Honestly, projects that focus on building solid infrastructure are really boring to watch, but they last the longest.
---
People waiting for a surge have already left; what's left are the true witnesses of the race.
---
There are no shortcuts on the path of stablecoins. Just accept it, everyone.
---
It's quite interesting. Using real-world scenarios to replace narrative is indeed more clear-headed, much better than those who tell stories every day.
---
The problem is retail investors simply can't wait; the crypto world moves too fast.
---
Not relying on emotions to pump? That would be so boring, but it also shows it's reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 6h ago
The narrative of slow variables has been heard many times, but honestly, projects that can truly last until that day are rare.
Wait, are you saying that not having a story is actually an advantage? Then how do you attract new investors?
However, I have been paying attention to Plasma, which is indeed focusing on practical implementation.
Honestly, I don't gamble on projects that develop slowly, but I can't deny that their logic is self-consistent.
How will those who experience explosive growth live? Just maintaining this pace steadily would be good enough.
Payments and settlements are truly infrastructure; not burning money on marketing actually says something.
Frankly, I don't understand the long-term expectations for projects like $XPL.
Slow variables = boredom, but maybe boredom is the essence of making money?
Switching certainty for time—who still has the patience nowadays, haha.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 7h ago
Basically, it's a project that tests patience and isn't suitable for those who want quick results.
Wait, a slow variable really means you're actually working, right?
In the end, the ones that can make money from this are actually those who don't pursue speed.
There is a viewpoint that not everyone may agree with, but it’s worth mentioning:
Projects like $XPL$ do not rely on emotional hype. Every step of its progress—from payment systems and clearing mechanisms to compliance integration—is a slow variable, making it difficult to generate continuous price stimulation. This also means that if you’re waiting for a surge, you’re probably going to be disappointed.
But from another perspective, this very characteristic makes it stand out:
**Using time to gain certainty** — not relying on stories or hot topics, but on solid functional iterations and ecosystem development.
**Using real usage to tell the narrative** — no fancy tricks, only step-by-step validation of feasibility in payment and settlement scenarios.
So the key question becomes: in the race for stablecoin infrastructure, who will ultimately survive? If this question piques your interest, the Plasma ecosystem is worth adding to your observation list.