When it comes to privacy coins, many people's first reaction is absolute concealment and untraceability. But $DUSK operates on a different logic——it aims for both privacy protection and compliance with regulatory requirements. This may sound contradictory, but they achieve it with a cryptographic protocol called Hedger.
How does it work? Through transactions initiated by Hedger, ordinary users and network participants see completely encrypted data. Transaction details are hidden, protecting trade secrets and user privacy. But that's not the whole story——for authorized regulatory agencies and auditors, the situation is different. They hold specific keys that allow them to view the full transaction process like using a "periscope," ensuring anti-money laundering and other compliance requirements are met.
This is the brilliance of "selective disclosure." On one hand, ironclad privacy protection; on the other, full transparency when necessary——both are achieved. For institutional users, this solves a big problem: they can use privacy technology without worrying about crossing regulatory lines. This balanced design is precisely the key breakthrough for large-scale adoption of privacy solutions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationSurvivor
· 9h ago
Wow, this is the real realization—privacy and compliance are not enemies at all.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 9h ago
Amazing, this is the right way for privacy coins. It's not about money laundering, but truly protecting users.
The selective disclosure design is well understood; regulators and privacy no longer have to be at odds.
If Hedger's system can really be implemented, institutions will be thrilled. It is compliant and does not expose business secrets.
It seems DUSK has identified the Achilles' heel of privacy coins—those completely black-box ones that have always been under regulatory scrutiny.
This is the breakthrough, but whether it can be widely adopted depends on execution.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 9h ago
Listen up, this is the right way. Privacy coins need to learn how to shake hands with regulators.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 9h ago
Hey, I need to ponder this logic. Can privacy and regulation really be compatible?
It's a bit like Schrödinger's privacy coin—encrypted yet transparent. Feels like there might be some surprises coming.
This is probably what institutions truly want, and it’s quite satisfying.
But can Hedger's approach really withstand attacks? I'm a bit worried.
Selective disclosure sounds great in theory, but it would be good if it can actually be implemented.
This idea is indeed clever, but we’ll have to wait and see how it works in practice.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatorFlash
· 9h ago
Sounds good, but I'm more concerned about... how is the collateralization threshold of this Hedger protocol set? Selective disclosure sounds nice, but what if the regulatory authority's key gets cracked? How robust is the risk control mechanism?
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 9h ago
The regulatory lens and the shield of privacy—this design really has something special.
When it comes to privacy coins, many people's first reaction is absolute concealment and untraceability. But $DUSK operates on a different logic——it aims for both privacy protection and compliance with regulatory requirements. This may sound contradictory, but they achieve it with a cryptographic protocol called Hedger.
How does it work? Through transactions initiated by Hedger, ordinary users and network participants see completely encrypted data. Transaction details are hidden, protecting trade secrets and user privacy. But that's not the whole story——for authorized regulatory agencies and auditors, the situation is different. They hold specific keys that allow them to view the full transaction process like using a "periscope," ensuring anti-money laundering and other compliance requirements are met.
This is the brilliance of "selective disclosure." On one hand, ironclad privacy protection; on the other, full transparency when necessary——both are achieved. For institutional users, this solves a big problem: they can use privacy technology without worrying about crossing regulatory lines. This balanced design is precisely the key breakthrough for large-scale adoption of privacy solutions.