This article uncovers the underlying leverage and structural dynamics at play, going deep to examine how derivatives and new financial products are being woven into a new framework.
The broader landscape is coming into focus:
Bitcoin is the battleground.
MicroStrategy is the signal.
The conflict is a direct confrontation between financialists and sovereignists.
This isn’t just about asset allocation. It’s the early stage of a transformation that could span decades—like tectonic plates shifting beneath society, eventually causing visible fractures.
We’re now standing on this fault line.
Matt @ Macrominutes offers the most robust analytical framework so far.
Financialists
Since a secret backroom deal in 1913, financialists have maintained tight control. This group includes:
Their power relies on synthetic monetary signals—the ability to create credit, shape expectations, manipulate price discovery, and dominate all major settlement mechanisms.
Eurodollars, swaps, futures, repos, and forward guidance are their tools. Their survival depends on controlling the abstract layers that obscure the underlying money supply.
Sovereignists
On the other side are sovereignists—those seeking a healthier, less distorted monetary system. This camp isn’t always unified. It includes friends and adversaries, individuals and nations, and a spectrum of political and ethical views.
Members include:
They see Bitcoin as a cure for centralized monetary power. Even if many don’t fully grasp its implications, they intuitively sense a core truth:
Bitcoin breaks the monopoly on money.
For financialists, that’s intolerable.
Flashpoint: Conversion Channels
The current battle centers on conversion channels—the systems for exchanging fiat for Bitcoin and vice versa.
Whoever controls the channels controls:

This fight is no longer theoretical.
It’s here, and it’s accelerating.
We’ve faced similar turning points before—not with Bitcoin, but through a technological revolution that fundamentally reshaped American finance, politics, and society.
Between 1900 and 1920, America’s industrial giants faced:
They didn’t retreat.
They moved toward even greater centralization.
The legacy of those efforts is still visible today:
Healthcare System
The Flexner Report (1910) standardized medical education, eliminated centuries-old traditional remedies, and laid the foundation for the Rockefeller healthcare empire, which became the core of modern American pharmaceutical power.
Education System
Industrialists funded the creation of standardized schools, designed to produce compliant workers for centralized industrial production. That system persists today, now serving the service sector instead of manufacturing.
Food and Agriculture
The consolidation of agribusiness built a food system that’s high in calories, low in nutrition, and packed with additives and chemicals. Over a century, this has reshaped American health, social dynamics, and the political economy.
Monetary System
In December 1913, the Federal Reserve Act imported the European central banking model.
Ten months earlier, the federal income tax (then a 1% levy on incomes above $3,000—about $90,000 in 2025 dollars) created a permanent revenue stream to service the national debt.
This established the foundation of the modern fiat debt system.
That was the last major systemic shift—a silent restructuring of American power around centralized monetary authority, managed by an institution independent of the elected government and operating under opaque rules.
We’re at the next inflection point.
This time, the foundation is decentralized—and incorruptible.
That foundation is Bitcoin.
The players are familiar: on one side, today’s echoes of industrial giants; on the other, Jeffersonian populists. But the stakes are higher. Financialists wield a century of manipulation and narrative control. The sovereignist camp, though fragmented, holds tools the old system never anticipated.
For the first time since 1913, this struggle has entered public view.
This July, MicroStrategy launched STRC (“Stretch”). Most observers shrugged it off as another Michael Saylor brainstorm—a niche corporate lending tool or a fleeting marketing experiment.
They missed what STRC really means.
“STRC is the great conversion mechanism for capital markets—the first key incentive-adjustment lever.”
STRC is the first scalable, compliant mechanism that:
When Saylor called STRC “MicroStrategy’s iPhone moment,” many dismissed it.
But from the perspective of conversion channels?
STRC may actually be Bitcoin’s iPhone moment—the point where Bitcoin’s price mechanism reaches a self-reinforcing equilibrium, providing a stable foundation for system transition.
STRC connects Bitcoin assets, collateral base, and Bitcoin-driven credit and yield.
This matters because in an inflationary, depreciating currency environment, value quietly slips away from the uninformed. Those who understand what’s happening can now access pure collateral—a way to store and protect wealth and life across time and space.
Ultimately, when trust collapses, people seek truth. Bitcoin represents mathematical truth. STRC turns that principle into a financial engine.
It offers more than yield.
It channels suppressed fiat liquidity into a spiraling Bitcoin collateral cycle.
Financialists feel threatened. Some recognize what this means for their exploitative system.
They sense the consequences as this cycle grows.
As the US tries to “grow out” of debt by expanding the money supply and controlling the yield curve, savers will chase real returns when inflation rises.
Traditional channels can’t deliver, but Bitcoin can. MicroStrategy has built an enterprise-grade monetary loop:
Bitcoin appreciates:
This is a scarcity engine—a self-reinforcing system as fiat weakens.
The gap between suppressed fiat returns and Bitcoin’s structural yield becomes a monetary black hole.
If STRC scales, financialists could lose control over:
This is the backdrop for the first attack.
After Bitcoin peaked on October 6:
A few days later, rumors resurfaced that MSCI “might remove MSTR,” targeting MicroStrategy.
This sequence seems unnatural, showing signs of the first coordinated strike against the conversion channel. The pattern is hard to ignore.
When STRC held steady, it showed what a well-functioning Bitcoin-backed credit engine could look like.
The initial two weeks of data were small but meaningful:

Don’t just look at the dollar amounts—it’s the underlying mechanisms that matter.
Scale those mechanisms up, and financialists’ reactions make sense.
If STRC scales:
MicroStrategy isn’t just launching a product—it’s building a new conversion channel, and JPMorgan responded immediately.
In a shortened trading week—an ideal moment for structural moves—JPMorgan launched a high-profile “Bitcoin-linked” structured note.
Its design reads like a confession:
@Samcallah uncovered a more troubling fact: JPMorgan recently issued a series of IBIT-linked structured products.

This isn’t innovation—it’s the same old centralized playbook: profits for the designers, losses for everyone else.
It’s an attempt to regain control, pulling Bitcoin exposure back into the banking system without touching real Bitcoin.
This is the rebirth of the paper gold system. In this model:
Synthetic shadow = countless paper Bitcoins
In contrast:
Two products, two paradigms. One points to the future, the other clings to the past.
MicroStrategy threatens financialists because it is:
This explains the mounting pressure:
MSCI adjusted its rules to target companies with significant Bitcoin holdings—see @martypartymusic’s post:
MicroStrategy is targeted not because of Michael Saylor, but because its balance sheet structure is disrupting the financialist system.
It’s still a pattern, not definitive proof, but the signals are converging.
Zoom out, and the larger architecture becomes clear:
MicroStrategy is the prototype for a capital markets-grade Bitcoin reserve bank.
Sovereignists may not have spelled out this blueprint, but they’re converging on it, with STRC as the upstream catalyst.
STRC is neither debt nor equity. It’s an escape mechanism—a derivative that forces fiat to dissolve in scarcity through a catalytic reaction.
It breaks the monopolies on:
And it does so from within the legacy system, using its own regulatory framework as leverage.
Today, fiat’s inherent debasement is a plain, undeniable mathematical reality—more obvious to the public than ever. If Bitcoin becomes a tool for sovereignists, the financialist system could collapse as quickly as the Berlin Wall.
Because when truth is allowed to surface, victory often comes swiftly.
The battle unfolding now is for the conversion channel between fiat and Bitcoin.
This war will define the century.
For the first time in 110 years, both sides have shown their cards.
To witness this moment is extraordinary.





