
The Bytom blockchain protocol is a set of rules designed to enable the registration, transfer, and settlement of various types of assets on-chain. Its core objective is to map both real-world and purely digital rights onto a blockchain in a verifiable manner, providing a secure and scalable environment for transactions and smart contract execution.
Within the Bytom protocol, the native token BTM is used for paying transaction fees, incentivizing network participation, and partially for governance. The protocol typically employs a layered “main chain + side chain” architecture: the main chain focuses on decentralization and security, while side chains handle high-performance business logic and more flexible contract execution. Both layers cooperate through cross-chain components.
Bytom’s emphasis on bringing assets on-chain is aimed at solving issues inherent in traditional asset circulation, such as information asymmetry, slow settlement, cross-border difficulties, and weak compliance tracking. On-chain asset registration creates a verifiable “public ledger” for every transaction or entitlement.
This approach also facilitates multi-chain interoperability. Real-world assets or tokens from other blockchains can be mapped onto Bytom, gaining programmability and faster settlement, and then returned to their original networks via cross-chain bridges—enabling seamless interchain cooperation and value transfer.
Bytom’s transaction records use a design similar to UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output). In essence, each received asset is an independent “receipt” that can be spent by combining several receipts into new ones. This structure naturally supports parallel verification and traceability.
For complex business logic, Bytom introduces contracts and scripts to define asset usage conditions—such as who can spend, when transfers are allowed, and which criteria must be met for release. The main chain secures and settles transactions; side chains support high-frequency trading or advanced contract applications, balancing security with performance.
Bytom enables users to create, issue, and manage custom assets throughout their lifecycle. Issuers provide an “asset specification” detailing the asset’s name, total supply, divisibility, issuance and freeze rules, etc. An asset ID is generated on-chain and all subsequent transfers reference this ID.
For example, a company can issue points or vouchers on Bytom:
This on-chain rule-based management ensures every issuance, transfer, and redemption leaves a verifiable trail—reducing reliance on centralized reconciliation.
The Bytom main chain uses decentralized consensus mechanisms such as Proof-of-Work (PoW) to determine who validates transactions. Consensus can be understood as the “universally agreed accounting rules” of the network; PoW relies on computational competition to secure blocks against tampering, increasing the immutability of transaction history.
Side chains prioritize performance and often adopt delegated voting or Byzantine Fault Tolerance consensus algorithms—enabling fast agreement among fewer nodes for high-frequency business needs. For cross-chain operations, Bytom typically uses multi-signature or threshold signature “bridges,” functioning like jointly managed “safes” to minimize single-point risks.
Open-source code with regular audits, on-chain governance of critical parameters, and decentralized node distribution are all key pillars of Bytom’s security model.
Bytom provides programmable cross-chain asset transfer capabilities. In these scenarios, an asset is locked on its original chain while an equivalent mapped token is minted on Bytom; users can then participate in swaps, collateralization, liquidation, and other activities within the protocol—supporting use cases such as decentralized exchange (DEX) and collateralized lending.
For example: a user bridges a mainstream asset onto Bytom and swaps it with a stablecoin on-chain. Fees are settled in BTM; after trading, users can continue utilizing assets within Bytom or redeem them back to their original chain via the bridge.
In the DeFi space, Bytom supports automated market maker (AMM) mechanisms. An AMM acts as a “self-service exchange,” where pool prices are managed by formulas instead of matching buyers with sellers. Combined with Bytom’s layered architecture, this approach offers both high throughput and robust security guarantees from the main chain.
Bytom emphasizes secure registration and circulation of multiple asset types, using a UTXO-based transaction model for traceability and parallel validation. Ethereum, by contrast, relies on an account-based model with a universal virtual machine—focusing on general-purpose smart contracts and programmability.
Architecturally, Bytom often employs a “main chain + side chain” structure for balancing security with performance; Ethereum is evolving toward Proof-of-Stake consensus and Layer 2 scaling solutions like Rollups to increase throughput. Both support DeFi and asset issuance, but differ in positioning and implementation focus—making them suitable for different application priorities.
Step 1: Choose a wallet and back up your mnemonic phrase. The mnemonic is the “master key” for asset recovery—store it offline securely; avoid screenshots or cloud storage.
Step 2: Acquire BTM for transaction fees. Purchase BTM from Gate and withdraw a small amount to your Bytom address for transfers and protocol interactions.
Step 3: Perform a small test transaction. Use a minimal amount for your first transfer or contract interaction on Bytom—verify your address and fee settings are correct.
Step 4: Use cross-chain or DeFi modules as needed. To bring assets from other networks onto Bytom, utilize official or ecosystem-provided bridges—check contract addresses, fee rates, and expected wait times carefully.
Step 5: Regularly review authorizations and risks. Revoke unnecessary contract approvals, monitor announcements and security alerts, and immediately pause operations if you detect abnormal activity.
Throughout these steps, be aware of potential delays or fee fluctuations due to network congestion. For large transactions, split them into batches and double-check destination chain and contract details.
Cross-chain bridges carry risks like contract vulnerabilities, private key mismanagement, or multi-signature failures; similar incidents have occurred in multi-chain ecosystems before. Secure custody and threshold signature implementations are critical—users should choose mature bridges that have undergone public audits and diversify their risk exposure.
On the contract level, poor logic design can lead to price manipulation, liquidation errors, or abuse of authorization rights. Always test new contracts with small amounts and beware of phishing links.
From a compliance perspective, asset mapping or registering real-world assets may trigger local securities, payment, or data regulations. Issuers should design products and disclosures within legal frameworks; users must understand the regulatory rules of their jurisdiction.
Key future directions for Bytom include: enhanced cross-chain interoperability and standardization; compliance tools for integrating real-world assets (RWA); automated smart contract security auditing; improved developer toolkits and documentation; as well as user experience enhancements and fee optimization.
Overall, Bytom positions itself in the sector of “multi-asset on-chain registration and cross-chain circulation.” Through robust security from its main chain plus high-performance side chains—together with BTM-driven economic incentives—it provides programmable infrastructure for asset issuance, transfer, and settlement. For developers and institutions, Bytom offers an option for experimenting with asset digitization and cross-chain collaboration; however, it is essential to thoroughly assess technical maturity and compliance requirements before large-scale deployment.
Assets on Bytom are protected by blockchain cryptography and consensus algorithms; once verified, transactions cannot be altered retroactively. Asset freezing depends entirely on the rules you set in your smart contracts—issuers have full control over their own asset logic. It’s advisable to study Bytom’s asset model in detail before issuing to ensure your contract logic matches your business needs.
There are three main steps: first, define the asset in your Bytom wallet or development tools (including name, supply amount, decimals etc.); next, submit an asset issuance transaction to the blockchain; finally, wait for network confirmation. Procedures may vary by tool—refer to Gate’s Bytom tutorials or official documentation for step-by-step guidance.
The UTXO model (used by Bitcoin) represents assets as independent "unspent outputs," making it inherently suitable for multi-asset scenarios—each asset can be managed separately. Compared to Ethereum’s account model, UTXO offers better privacy protection and parallel processing capabilities but poses a steeper learning curve for developers. Bytom leverages an improved UTXO model for flexible asset programmability.
Bytom averages 15 seconds per block with single-chain throughput in the hundreds of TPS—sufficient for medium-scale DeFi applications. For ultra-high frequency trading or extreme congestion scenarios, Layer 2 solutions or cross-chain scaling may be needed. For real-time performance stats, check Gate’s network data on Bytom.
Recommended learning path: Open an account on Gate and buy some BTM tokens to get familiar with the ecosystem; then download the official Bytom wallet to experience transfers and asset management; finally read official documentation to learn about smart contract development. Begin by issuing small test assets on testnet—build practical experience before moving to mainnet operations.


