
An Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) is a standardized process and document format for proposing changes to the Ethereum protocol or establishing new standards. EIPs serve as a transparent, unified basis for upgrades and application standards by outlining what to change and how to implement those changes. Each EIP combines elements of product requirements and technical specifications.
An EIP typically includes the motivation for the change, detailed specifications, compatibility considerations (such as potential conflicts with previous versions), and security implications. Anyone can submit an EIP, but adoption requires open community discussion and verification through client implementations, with final coordination handled by maintainers and ecosystem participants.
The core value of EIPs lies in alignment. Ethereum comprises a diverse set of clients, wallets, exchanges, and applications; without a unified process, coordinated upgrades would be difficult. EIPs clarify proposed changes and invite open discussion, reducing implementation discrepancies and mitigating security risks.
EIPs have had substantial impact—for example:
For users, these changes mean a more stable network experience and richer application diversity. By 2025, application-layer standards like ERC-20 and ERC-721 are widely supported by mainstream wallets and exchanges, with ongoing EIP iterations addressing scalability and security needs.
The EIP process typically follows these stages: ideation, drafting, broad review and last call for comments, followed by finalization or withdrawal. Open collaboration is fundamental—community members and implementers are encouraged to participate at every stage.
Common status labels include:
Take EIP-1559 as an example: it underwent forum discussions, specification refinement, client implementation, and testnet validation before going live in the "London" upgrade. This structured approach helps the ecosystem prepare for upgrades within defined timeframes.
EIPs are classified by content:
Each type follows public review and implementation validation but may differ slightly in adoption pathways.
EIP is a general term encompassing all improvement proposals and processes for Ethereum. ERCs are a subset of EIPs focused on application standards—mainly token, NFT, and interface conventions. In other words, ERCs are a branch within the broader EIP system targeting application developers and user-facing experiences.
For instance:
These standards are proposed and reviewed within the EIP framework before being adopted by wallets and exchanges.
EIPs directly shape how users interact with wallets and exchanges. Standards like ERC-20 and ERC-721 unify asset formats so wallets can accurately recognize and display assets, while exchanges can reliably handle deposits and withdrawals. On Gate's deposit page, you'll see references to network standards like "ERC-20"—indicating assets follow the respective standard for seamless cross-platform compatibility.
Fee experiences are also influenced by EIPs. Since EIP-1559’s launch, setting transaction fees has become more intuitive. EIP-4844 makes Layer 2 networks cheaper for transactions, with reduced costs when transferring funds from L2 to the mainnet or exchanges. During network upgrade windows, wallets and exchanges issue advance notices—users should watch for maintenance times and network options to avoid errors.
You don’t need to be a core developer to contribute to the EIP process—but following protocol is essential.
Step 1: Review the EIPs repository and historical discussions to check for similar proposals; clarify your motivation and anticipated impact.
Step 2: Start a topic on community forums (like EthMagicians) to gather feedback from various stakeholders and refine scope and compatibility strategies early on.
Step 3: Draft your EIP document according to templates—include motivation, technical specs, backward compatibility, security analysis, plus reference implementations or testing approaches.
Step 4: Submit a pull request (PR) to the EIPs repository; track editorial feedback, respond to suggestions, and update status/meta-information accordingly.
Step 5: Support client or contract-side implementation/testing; participate in testnet validation and audit discussions. During "Last Call," coordinate across the ecosystem.
Step 6: Based on feedback, proceed to "Final" status or opt for withdrawal/stagnation; also prepare migration/use guides so wallets/exchanges can rapidly adapt.
EIPs are part of an open process—not every proposal gets accepted. A common misconception is that EIPs are official mandates; in reality, adoption requires consensus among implementers and the broader ecosystem. Another misconception is that all EIPs will reduce costs or boost performance—many involve trade-offs with temporary or conditional effects.
Upgrade risks include compatibility issues, variations in client implementation details, or service disruptions during time windows. Users transacting on exchanges should pay attention to network notices and maintenance announcements; selecting the wrong network or moving large amounts during upgrades can delay deposits or even risk asset loss. Always test with small amounts and confirm transaction networks.
Recent EIP trends focus on scalability and usability. Account abstraction proposals drive more intuitive sign-in/payment experiences; data availability improvements and Layer 2 integration (e.g., advances linked to EIP-4844) continue lowering user costs. Discussions at both client and protocol layers address resistance to MEV extraction and enhanced privacy protection.
Meanwhile, cross-chain/interoperability standards, NFT rights/royalties, and more granular interface protocols continue evolving. By 2025, community debates center on smoother Layer 2–mainnet alignment and improving user experience without sacrificing decentralization.
EIPs function as Ethereum’s public "renovation platform," transforming ideas into standards that the ecosystem collaboratively implements. There are three main takeaways:
By understanding the process, keeping up with upgrade announcements, and operating according to standards, users can maintain security and efficiency amid change.
EIP-1559 is a major Ethereum improvement proposal that reformed how transaction fees are calculated. It introduced a two-tier structure: "base fee" plus "priority fee," making fees more transparent and predictable. The proposal also burns part of each transaction fee—reducing Ethereum’s supply—which is why it’s considered a historic upgrade.
Most users do not need to take proactive steps. Exchanges like Gate automatically adapt to EIP upgrades; your wallet/account will be compatible with new versions by default. Just follow official announcements for upgrade schedules or temporary service interruptions—and avoid large transactions during these periods.
Adoption requires broad consensus from the Ethereum community—including developers, miners, node operators, and users. If a proposal has design flaws, potential security risks, incompatibility with existing infrastructure, or insufficient support—it may be postponed or rejected. This safeguards Ethereum’s stability.
You can visit the official EIPs GitHub repository (ethereum/EIPs), which tracks all proposals along with their statuses (draft, review, final, etc.). Each EIP has detailed documentation and discussion records—making it the authoritative source for tracking Ethereum’s upgrade path.
Not every EIP triggers a hard fork—but major proposals often go live as part of specific hard fork upgrades. Hard forks bundle several significant EIPs into a network-wide update event—for example, the "London upgrade" included EIP-1559 among others. Understanding EIPs helps you follow Ethereum’s evolution more closely.


