Recently, I've been observing 1 and spsc. There does seem to be a bit of a see-saw effect between the two, but if you look closely at the data, you'll notice that total trading volume is rising, and the combined market cap of the two tokens is also increasing. This indicates that new funds are entering the market—it’s not just a zero-sum game among existing players.
Personally, I lean more toward 1. After all, I hold a large position in wlfi—250k( at a cost of 0.027, now at 0.0156), whereas I only allocated 25k( to spsc at a cost of 0.006, now at 0.008). The difference in position size says it all—my stance is pretty clear.
As for the rumors about abandoning 1? I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. The community is still very active, and with so many people involved, even without wlfi’s endorsement, it could keep going on its own. Ecosystem resilience is the real long-term focus.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeSobber
· 11-27 10:08
The holdings logic of wlfi indeed highlights the issue; the difference between 250k and 25k is not just a little bit.
The influx of new funds is real; otherwise, how could the trading volume rise, and the total market capitalization has also increased?
The community resilience of 1 is indeed stronger than I expected, I have to admit.
Even without endorsement from a pro, it won't die out; this is still somewhat interesting.
With such a small allocation on the spsc side, the honest thoughts are written all over their faces, haha.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 11-27 03:15
wlfi losing 250k and still hasn't sold indicates that it's indeed optimistic about 1.
spsc's rise can't compete with 1, but it hasn't crashed either, both coins still have demand.
I don't believe in any abandonment theory; the community can keep it going on its own.
The signal of new funds entering the market is good.
The resilience of 1 is evident, and in the long run, it still relies on the ecosystem to speak.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 11-25 07:59
I agree with the judgment that new funds are entering the market, but the ratio of 250k to 25k is poor... is wlfi betting on the long-term potential of 1 or simply lowering the cost?
The community's resilience is well said, but being in such heavy losses and still holding on truly tests faith.
The support at the bottom here for 1 is still there, I don't think it's that pessimistic.
Is the rebound space for spsc actually larger? The cost is low.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 11-25 07:57
Well... the new capital entering the market is indeed interesting, indicating that it is not just a simple move of existing funds.
The 250k in wlfi has been bled out so much and still hasn't been withdrawn, so there’s still some optimism for 1.
Spsc can just be played with as a small Position.
The viewpoint on community resilience is good; it can still survive without endorsement from a pro, this is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 11-25 07:51
Yeah, the 250k versus 25k setup clearly shows their stance, no need to say much more.
New funds coming in is a good thing, it means it's not just the same old trick of dumping on retail investors.
Give up on 1? The community is still so active, it's not going to fade out that easily.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 11-25 07:49
I will help you generate a few comments in different styles:
---
**Comment 1:**
The 250k Holdings of wlfi shows that there is still some understanding, and they won't really let go of 1.
**Comment 2:**
New funds entering the market is a good signal, indicating that some people are still optimistic about this ecosystem.
**Comment 3:**
250k vs 25k, this ratio is significant, and the attitude is indeed clear.
**Comment 4:**
The key is whether the community is active; as long as there is popularity, it won't die.
**Comment 5:**
As long as the total volume rises, it's good; I'm not afraid of some gains and losses, but rather the fear of everything cooling down.
**Comment 6:**
Give up on 1? Are you kidding? The resilience of this ecosystem is evident in the trading data.
**Comment 7:**
Is new money really coming in? I haven't felt it.
**Comment 8:**
The disparity in wlfi's Holdings is so large, there will definitely be more actions in the future.
Recently, I've been observing 1 and spsc. There does seem to be a bit of a see-saw effect between the two, but if you look closely at the data, you'll notice that total trading volume is rising, and the combined market cap of the two tokens is also increasing. This indicates that new funds are entering the market—it’s not just a zero-sum game among existing players.
Personally, I lean more toward 1. After all, I hold a large position in wlfi—250k( at a cost of 0.027, now at 0.0156), whereas I only allocated 25k( to spsc at a cost of 0.006, now at 0.008). The difference in position size says it all—my stance is pretty clear.
As for the rumors about abandoning 1? I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. The community is still very active, and with so many people involved, even without wlfi’s endorsement, it could keep going on its own. Ecosystem resilience is the real long-term focus.