After 130 days leading the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk stepped down from his Trump admin role in late May. The headline? $170 billion in claimed savings — roughly $1,056 per American taxpayer. But here’s where it gets interesting.
Musk initially promised to slash $2 trillion from a $7 trillion budget. Reality check: he ended up claiming 170 billion. That’s a massive gap, and media outlets have already spotted accounting errors in his “wall of receipts.” Still, let’s break down what actually happened:
The Four Money Moves
Workforce Downsizing
DOGE pushed 284,044 planned layoffs across federal agencies. They sent “Fork in the road” buyout emails to 2M+ employees and then forced probationary worker cuts across HHS and digital services. Result: lower payroll + reduced pension liabilities.
Recovering “Lost” Funds
HUD had $1.9 billion sitting around unaccounted for (per DOGE’s claim). A follow-up audit found another $260 million in potential savings. Whether these were truly “lost” or just reallocated remains debated.
Contract Terminations
Nearly 10,000 contracts axed, primarily through USAID (83% of their contracts). DOGE claims $34 billion saved, with one contract worth $2.9 billion alone. The question: were these terminations legitimate efficiency moves or politically motivated?
Fraud Crackdown
Here’s the wild one — DOGE found $330 million in Small Business Administration loans issued to ineligible recipients, including a nine-month-old who got $100,000. New rule: borrowers must be 18-120 years old to qualify. This one actually checks out as legitimate waste prevention.
The Takeaway
Between the $170 billion claims, the accounting questions, and the ongoing debate about whether these moves help or harm government effectiveness, one thing’s clear: DOGE’s impact is polarizing. Some see genuine waste removal; others see aggressive cuts to essential services. The actual audit trail will matter more than the headline numbers.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
DOGE's 130-Day Experiment: Did Musk Really Save Taxpayers $170 Billion?
After 130 days leading the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk stepped down from his Trump admin role in late May. The headline? $170 billion in claimed savings — roughly $1,056 per American taxpayer. But here’s where it gets interesting.
Musk initially promised to slash $2 trillion from a $7 trillion budget. Reality check: he ended up claiming 170 billion. That’s a massive gap, and media outlets have already spotted accounting errors in his “wall of receipts.” Still, let’s break down what actually happened:
The Four Money Moves
Workforce Downsizing DOGE pushed 284,044 planned layoffs across federal agencies. They sent “Fork in the road” buyout emails to 2M+ employees and then forced probationary worker cuts across HHS and digital services. Result: lower payroll + reduced pension liabilities.
Recovering “Lost” Funds HUD had $1.9 billion sitting around unaccounted for (per DOGE’s claim). A follow-up audit found another $260 million in potential savings. Whether these were truly “lost” or just reallocated remains debated.
Contract Terminations Nearly 10,000 contracts axed, primarily through USAID (83% of their contracts). DOGE claims $34 billion saved, with one contract worth $2.9 billion alone. The question: were these terminations legitimate efficiency moves or politically motivated?
Fraud Crackdown Here’s the wild one — DOGE found $330 million in Small Business Administration loans issued to ineligible recipients, including a nine-month-old who got $100,000. New rule: borrowers must be 18-120 years old to qualify. This one actually checks out as legitimate waste prevention.
The Takeaway
Between the $170 billion claims, the accounting questions, and the ongoing debate about whether these moves help or harm government effectiveness, one thing’s clear: DOGE’s impact is polarizing. Some see genuine waste removal; others see aggressive cuts to essential services. The actual audit trail will matter more than the headline numbers.