The trading depth of certain probabilistic trading assets is indeed concerning, with low trading volume and insufficient market activity. The reference value of such products is therefore limited. If the trading depth is not enough, price signals tend to be distorted, so it's more reliable to look for actively traded assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 2h ago
Insufficient depth is a trap; slippage eats you up completely.
View OriginalReply0
MelonField
· 2h ago
Assets with poor liquidity are really a trap, with slippage so high it's suffocating
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 2h ago
Low-liquidity assets are indeed a trap; slippage can wipe you out.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 2h ago
The trading volume is too low to play at all, and slippage will kill you without negotiation.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 2h ago
Assets with poor liquidity are really a trap. Price signals seem to be playing around.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 2h ago
Low trading volume is a trap; it's impossible to play properly.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 2h ago
Assets with poor liquidity are really a trap, with slippage being outrageously high
The trading depth of certain probabilistic trading assets is indeed concerning, with low trading volume and insufficient market activity. The reference value of such products is therefore limited. If the trading depth is not enough, price signals tend to be distorted, so it's more reliable to look for actively traded assets.