Physical assets hitting the blockchain—it's happening, but not without friction.
Most general-purpose chains stumble hard on two fronts: regulatory compliance and fractional ownership mechanics. They weren't architected for these demands in the first place.
What's needed is a purpose-built L1. Infrastructure designed from the ground up specifically for RWA tokenization. A vertical solution that actually understands the compliance layer and can handle atomized ownership without breaking a sweat.
That's where the real infrastructure for digitizing the physical world lives—Layer 1 protocols engineered for asset representation.
Thecase study? Engage with on-chain gaming ecosystems. When users grind XP through gameplay, they're not just earning points—they're securing tokenized value. This same mechanic scales to real estate, commodities, or any tangible asset. The infrastructure that makes gaming rewards non-fungible and portable is exactly what powers RWA markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 7h ago
Bro, building an L1 alone can solve compliance issues? That sounds to me like another fundraising story for a new project...
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 8h ago
To be honest, using a general chain for RWA is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Regulations are tightly restrictive, and splitting ownership is even more of a joke. It might be better to just create a dedicated L1 designed specifically for this purpose from the ground up... It sounds good in theory, but actually implementing it is another matter altogether.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 8h ago
Haha, existing L1s are really just sharpening their tools for RWA... General-purpose chains are all-rounders, but in the end, everything is quite ordinary.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 8h ago
General Chain simply can't handle RWA. I've seen through it long ago; all that's missing is a truly compliance-savvy L1 to save the day.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 8h ago
nah, been saying this since '17—general chains tryna do everything are good at nothing. rwa needs its own rails, not band-aids on ethereum. gaming tokenomics blueprint actually hits different tho, fair point there.
Reply0
MEVEye
· 8h ago
Now it seems like every chain wants to do RWA, but truly knowledgeable about compliance are few... Dedicated L1 is the way out.
Physical assets hitting the blockchain—it's happening, but not without friction.
Most general-purpose chains stumble hard on two fronts: regulatory compliance and fractional ownership mechanics. They weren't architected for these demands in the first place.
What's needed is a purpose-built L1. Infrastructure designed from the ground up specifically for RWA tokenization. A vertical solution that actually understands the compliance layer and can handle atomized ownership without breaking a sweat.
That's where the real infrastructure for digitizing the physical world lives—Layer 1 protocols engineered for asset representation.
Thecase study? Engage with on-chain gaming ecosystems. When users grind XP through gameplay, they're not just earning points—they're securing tokenized value. This same mechanic scales to real estate, commodities, or any tangible asset. The infrastructure that makes gaming rewards non-fungible and portable is exactly what powers RWA markets.