2025-12-31 14:22:08

Here's the real deal: building with centralized systems is way simpler, but making decentralized networks actually work? That's where things get tricky.

Take FABRIC as an example. When robots or autonomous systems operate together in the same environment, they can't just lean on a single server, one controlling authority, or depend on any single vendor lock-in. That's the whole problem it solves.

What FABRIC brings to the table is pretty straightforward but powerful. First, verifiable identity—each participant has a cryptographically secure identity that others can trust without needing a middleman. Second, shared context—all nodes can access and verify the same information, creating a reliable foundation for coordination.

The payoff? Multiple independent systems can work together, make decisions, and synchronize without any single point of failure. That's the whole point of decentralization, but getting it right technically is the hard part.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

JustHereForAirdrops

· 1h ago

NGL, centralized systems are indeed satisfying, but decentralization is the future... It's easy to say, but hard to do.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 1h ago

According to the white paper, FABRIC's identity verification mechanism indeed addresses the trust issue between nodes, but it is worth noting—whether its consensus efficiency can hold up under high concurrency scenarios still depends on on-chain data. --- Decentralization is indeed the future, but the complexity of technological implementation is underestimated, especially the part involving incentive incompatibility. --- The cryptographic identity part is good, but I still have to ask—under conditions where malicious nodes account for more than 33%, is this mechanism really stable? --- The single point of failure problem has been solved, but what about governance costs? Based on DAO proposal voting data, decision-making efficiency in such systems is often an order of magnitude worse than centralized ones. --- I get the pain points FABRIC aims to solve, but the equilibrium of game among autonomous systems... is actually quite fragile. --- Shared context sounds great, but have you calculated the data synchronization costs among nodes? Throughput will be dragged down.

View OriginalReply0

ser_aped.eth

· 2h ago

NGL Fabric sounds pretty good, but can it really solve the single point of failure issue? It still seems to depend on whether the ecosystem can truly expand.

View OriginalReply0