2025-12-31 17:29:47

Tom Lee has indeed put a lot of effort into the financial structure design of BMNR. Recently, there have been many doubts about him in the market, with some saying BMNR is about to爆雷, and others worried about the project's interest payment issues. But when you actually open BMNR's balance sheet, you'll see a completely different picture.

As of the latest quarterly financial report, the debt ratio has been brought down to 1.16%—a very稳健 number. The market's anxiety is separated from the actual data on the books by a huge information gap. Often, it's not that the project has problems, but that people haven't delved into those specific financial indicators. To understand how BMNR is really doing, instead of guessing, it's better to look directly at the numbers.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 1h ago

1.16% debt ratio is indeed impressive, but the problem is that most people don't bother to look at financial reports anyway—they just listen to jokes. Numbers don't lie, but the real concern is that some numbers themselves are lying. Having a low debt ratio is useless; what's crucial is whether cash flow and actual income can support it—that's the hard truth. Tom Lee's recent moves are indeed prudent, but the market always prefers stories over data—it's funny. 1.16%? Looks good, but who can guarantee it will be the same next quarter? That's where the risk in the crypto market lies. Leaks and financial report data are always two different worlds; I'm used to it. The term 'information gap' is quite accurate, but honestly, most people aren't professional enough to understand those indicators.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBouncer

· 1h ago

1.16% debt ratio sounds good, but what is the real situation? I’ve seen Tom Lee’s numerical magic many times. It depends on the details behind the financial report; just looking at surface numbers can be misleading. It’s not that I don’t believe, but these days, project teams’ ledgers... are you guys cowardly or not? Is BMNR this time truly stable, or is it just another prelude to a round of chopping the leeks? The 1.16% debt ratio indeed refutes the previous explosion theory, but the question is about liquidity. After opening the financial report and looking around, I care more about asset quality than that ratio. Information gap? I think it’s just another name for information asymmetry.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMaskedRider

· 1h ago

1.16% This debt ratio really can't be sustained anymore; it depends on how the financial report is calculated. Another "Understand by looking at the data," but why do I feel like I've heard this phrase many times? Can Tom Lee hold up this time? Trust was also broken last time. Numbers can be deceptive; the key is who the auditor is. If BMNR were truly so stable, why are there so many rumors in the market? A truly transparent project would have been recognized by the mainstream long ago; there's no need to explain so hard. Anxiety might not be unfounded; it just hasn't exploded yet. 1.16% sounds very low, but adding a few zeros afterward—what's the truth? Articles claiming "Understand by looking at the financial report" are the most suspicious.

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 1h ago

The 1.16% debt ratio is indeed impressive. No wonder there are rumors going around; information gaps are really an opportunity to make money.

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 2h ago

1.16% debt ratio? I feel like this number is a bit too good to be true... Is it real? --- Alright, I'll go check the financial report, but don't blame me if I get cut again. --- TomLee really has something, but there's too much noise in the market, no one listens. --- Question mark turned on. How is this debt ratio calculated? Is there an audit? --- Numbers speak for themselves, but only if these numbers are genuine... --- 1.16% sounds great, but I wonder how many hidden risks are behind it. --- At least I went through the financial report once, and I didn't see any signs of a major problem, maybe my eyesight isn't good. --- It's "let the numbers do the talking" again. The last time it was said about this project, how is it now?

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 2h ago

1.16% debt ratio, this number is indeed a bit shocking, but the market is still worried about a potential crash. How many times have we heard "look at the financial report," only to see the price drop again next month? Is this real this time, or just another numbers game? Tom Lee's explanation has been heard many times, but why does the market still not trust him? Good financial reports are good, but I just don't understand why the coin price can't go up. A low debt ratio is a good thing, but what does that have to do with my wallet? It's always "understandable by looking at the financial report," but even after understanding, the coin still hasn't risen. These numbers are even better than Tesla's financial report; why does it feel like the enthusiasm has cooled down? Such a big information gap, those institutions must have already taken action. 1.16% sounds intimidating, but I just want to know when I can break even.

View OriginalReply0